2005 House Bill 5374 / 2006 Public Act 607

Revise number of judges in various counties

Introduced in the House

Oct. 26, 2005

Introduced by Rep. William Van Regenmorter (R-74)

To revise the number of circuit, probate and district judges in a number of counties, according to recommendations from the state Supreme Court.

Referred to the Committee on Judiciary

Nov. 30, 2005

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (H-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass. Among other changes this does not remove one judge from the 41st Circuit Court (Dickinson and Menominee Counties), which the original version did.

Jan. 17, 2006

Substitute offered

To revise the details of where and how many judges would would be added or removed from various circuits and districts. For details see <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2005-2006/billanalysis/house/htm/2005-HLA-5374-3.htm">House Fiscal Agency analysis</a>.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Roger Kahn (R-94)

To strip out a provision that would have removed one judgeship from the 70th judicial district, which is Saginaw County.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. David Robertson (R-51)

To add a judge to the seventh judicial circuit, which is Genesee County.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Reps. Bill McConico (D-5) and Bill McConico (D-5)

To remove most of the proposed additions and reductions in the numbers of judges from the bill. With adoption of this amendment the bill adds one judge in the 6th circuit (Oakland County), one in the 7th circuit (Genesee County) one in the 49th circuit (Mecosta and Osceola Counties), and one in the 49th circuit (Clare and Gladwin Counties).

The amendment passed by voice vote

Jan. 18, 2006

Passed in the House 101 to 0 (details)

To add one judge in the 6th circuit (Oakland County), one in the 7th circuit (Genesee County), one in the 16th (Macomb County), one in the 17th (Kent County) one in the 49th circuit (Mecosta and Osceola Counties), and one in the 55th circuit (Clare and Gladwin Counties).

Received in the Senate

Jan. 19, 2006

Referred to the Committee on Judiciary

Nov. 30, 2006

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (S-3) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

Dec. 5, 2006

Substitute offered

To replace the previous version of the bill with one that only authorizes a new judge in Oakland County.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Dec. 6, 2006

Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)

To add one judge in the 6th circuit (Oakland County).

Received in the House

Dec. 6, 2006

Dec. 13, 2006

Passed in the House 104 to 0 (details)

To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill, which only adds a judge in the 6th circuit (Oakland County).

Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm

Dec. 31, 2006