Introduced by Sen. Arlan Meekhof R-West Olive on October 31, 2013
To increase the maximum campaign contributions allowed by state election law, index these to inflation, and require additional finance reports from candidates. Official Text and Analysis.
Referred to the Senate Local Government & Elections Committee on October 31, 2013
Reported in the Senate on November 14, 2013
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the Senate on November 14, 2013
The substitute passed by voice vote in the Senate on November 14, 2013
Amendment offered by Sen. Gretchen Whitmer D- on November 14, 2013
To cut the allowable campaign contribution limits in half instead of doubling them.
To increase the maximum campaign contributions allowed by state election law, index these to inflation, and require additional finance reports from candidates. The bill would also establish that third party "issue ads" that do not expressly advocate the election of a candidate or issue need not include a disclosure of who paid for the ad, and allow the Republican and Democratic caucuses in the legislature to raise and spend money promoting their preferred candidates in primary elections.
Received in the House on November 14, 2013
Referred to the House Elections and Ethics Committee on November 14, 2013
Reported in the House on December 10, 2013
With the recommendation that the amendments be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Amendment offered in the House on December 11, 2013
The amendment passed by voice vote in the House on December 11, 2013
Amendment offered by Rep. Lisa Lyons R-Alto on December 11, 2013
To strip-out the provision in the Senate-passed version of the bill that would have repealed a ban on Republican and Democratic caucuses in the legislature raising and spending money promoting their preferred candidates in primary elections.
The amendment passed by voice vote in the House on December 11, 2013
Amendment offered by Rep. Theresa Abed D-Grand Ledge on December 11, 2013
To cut campaign contribution caps in half rather than doubling them.
The amendment failed by voice vote in the House on December 11, 2013
Amendment offered by Rep. Andy Schor D-Lansing on December 11, 2013
To mandate that an individual or organization who buys a political “issue ad” that references a candidate or ballot question (but does not necessarily engage in campaign-related “express advocacy”) within 60 days of an election must file a report with the Secretary of State within seven days containing the full name and street address of each person who contributed for the ad. The Secretary of State would then have to post this information on the internet within 24 hours.
The amendment failed by voice vote in the House on December 11, 2013
Amendment offered by Rep. Andy Schor D-Lansing on December 11, 2013
To not double campaign contribution caps, but instead leave them at current levels.
The amendment failed by voice vote in the House on December 11, 2013
Substitute offered by Rep. Collene Lamonte D-Montague on December 11, 2013
To adopt a version of the bill that does not increase contribution amounts.
The substitute failed by voice vote in the House on December 11, 2013
Amendment offered by Rep. Martin Howrylak R-Troy on December 11, 2013
To cut in half the maximum amount that a "political action committee" (PAC) can contribute to candidates.
The amendment failed by voice vote in the House on December 11, 2013
Amendment offered by Rep. Anthony Forlini R-Harrison Twp. on December 11, 2013
To require political "robocalls" that "expressly advocate" the election or defeat of a candidate or ballot question to disclose the name and address of the person paying for the calls.
The amendment passed by voice vote in the House on December 11, 2013
To double the maximum campaign contributions allowed by state election law, index these to inflation, and require additional finance reports from candidates. The bill would also establish that organizations that run third party "issue ads" which do not "expressly advocate" for or against a candidate or ballot issue need not disclose the names and addresses of who paid for the ad (but do have to disclose the sponsoring organization), and require political "robocalls" that do not engage in "express advocacy" to include who paid for the calls.
Received in the Senate on December 12, 2013
Motion by Sen. Tonya Schuitmaker R-Lawton on December 12, 2013
To reject as out-of-order an amendment proposed by Sen. Bieda to make enactment of this bill conditional on passage of Senate Bill 168, which would mandate extensive candidate disclosures of their personal finances.