To revise the structure of hunting and fishing license fees in a manner that would increase license fees for most sportsmen. For example, the cost for a resident to hunt deer would go from $15 to $31, and the minimum fishing license cost would increase from $15 to $26. The House Fiscal Agency reports this would extract an additional $19.7 million annually from sportsmen. For details on specific licenses see their analysis.   Official Text and Analysis.

With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

To include wolf hunting in the proposed license structure, and impose an additional $5 application fee for a wolf license.

With the recommendation that the substitute (S-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

The vote by which the bill was defeated.

To revise the structure of hunting and fishing license fees in a manner that would increase license fees for most sportsmen. For example, the cost for a resident to hunt deer would go from $15 to $31, and the minimum fishing license cost would increase from $15 to $26. The House Fiscal Agency reports this would extract an additional $19.7 million annually from sportsmen. For details on specific licenses see their analysis.

To require the Department of Natural Resources to "complete and post on its website a fisheries division strategic and tactical plan with measures and metrics".

To earmark $1 million annually in fishing license fees to "support local parks that offer fishing opportunities".

To cut the proposed price for a non-resident "additional antlerless deer" license from $170 to $75.

To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.