Introduced
by
To establish a “rebuttable presumption” that a person caught stripping more than $100 or 100 pounds of metal from a building or structure does not have the permission of the owner, and so is committing larceny as defined in a 2008 scrap metal theft law.
Referred to the Committee on Economic Development
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the bill pass.
Amendment offered
To establish that having a valid copy of an applicable building or demolition permit rebuts the proposed presumption.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 36 to 1 (details)
To establish a “rebuttable presumption” that a person caught stripping more than $100 or 100 pounds of metal from a building or structure does not have the permission of the owner, and so is committing larceny as defined in a 2008 scrap metal theft law.
Referred to the Committee on Regulatory Reform
