2009 House Bill 4093

Require citizenship and resident preferences in subsidies & tax breaks

Introduced in the House

Jan. 22, 2009

Introduced by Rep. Bettie Cook Scott (D-3)

To prohibit a local government from granting Plant Rehabilitation and Industrial Development District property tax breaks unless the recipient promises not to knowingly hire illegal aliens, and to make a good faith effort to only hire Michigan residents and use Michigan suppliers and vendors on the project unless that means the project cannot be completed. Violators could have their tax breaks revoked and be required to repay all or part of those already used. Local governments would have to report annually to the Michigan Strategic Fund board on the number of residents employed by beneficiaries of these tax breaks, and the specific reasons for each exemption granted from the proposed state-resident-job requirements.

Referred to the Committee on Labor

Feb. 10, 2009

Reported without amendment

Without amendment and with the recommendation that the bill pass.

March 12, 2009

Amendment offered by Rep. Fred Miller (D-31)

To transfer the duty to file compliance and job-creation reports with state targeted tax break-granting officials from the local government authorizing these particular tax breaks to to the recipient.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Passed in the House 79 to 28 (details)

To prohibit a local government from granting Plant Rehabilitation and Industrial Development District property tax breaks unless the recipient promises not to knowingly hire illegal aliens, and to make a good faith effort to only hire Michigan residents and use Michigan suppliers and vendors on the project unless that means the project cannot be completed. Violators could have their tax breaks revoked and be required to repay all or part of those already used. Tax break recipients would have to report annually to the Michigan Strategic Fund board on the number of residents employed by the beneficiaries of these bonds and tax breaks, and their "good faith efforts" to comply with the employee residency and related mandates.

Received in the Senate

March 18, 2009

Referred to the Committee on Commerce and Tourism

April 1, 2009

Motion by Sen. Samuel B. Thomas (D-4)

To discharge the Committee on Commerce and Tourism from further consideration of House Bills 4083 to 4093, and move them directly to the Senate floor for immediate consideration and debate. The bills would impose citizenship and resident preferences on companies that benefit from subsidies or tax breaks, or that have contracts with the state. A single motion covered all 11 bill, and the roll call vote on that is <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/RollCall.aspx?ID=380801">here</a>.

The motion failed by voice vote

May 7, 2009

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

Substitute offered

The substitute passed by voice vote

Substitute offered by Sen. John Gleason (D-27)

The substitute failed 16 to 21 (details)

Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)

Received in the House

May 7, 2009

June 18, 2009

Substitute offered by Rep. Bettie Cook Scott (D-3)

To replace the previous version of the bill with one that tie-bar it to House Bills 4085 and 4086, meaning this bill cannot become law unless those ones do also. These other bills in the "residents only" package are favored by the House Democratic majority because they exempt union members from the restrictive provisions.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Goeff Hansen (R-100)

To not tie-bar the bill to House Bills 4085 and 4086. These other bills in the "residents only" package are favored by the House Democratic majority because they exempt union members from the restrictive provisions.

The amendment failed by voice vote

Passed in the House 76 to 32 (details)

To adopt a version of the bill that "tie-bars" it to House Bills 4085 and 4086. These other bills in the "residents only" package are favored by the House Democratic majority because they exempt union members from the restrictive provisions proposed by the bill.

Received in the Senate

June 25, 2009

Failed in the Senate 16 to 20 (details)

To concur with the House-passed version of the bill.

Received in the House

Aug. 19, 2009