2004 House Bill 5932 / Public Act 222

Revise drug court fingerprint reports

Introduced in the House

May 20, 2004

Introduced by Rep. Alexander Lipsey (D-60)

To require that certain criminal cases that do not result in convictions because they were processed in a drug treatment court be reported to the State Police to keep the offender's fingerprints in non-public records. These are cases involving a minor in possession of alcohol or a medical professional practicing while intoxicated.

Referred to the Committee on Judiciary

May 25, 2004

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the amendment be adopted and that the bill then pass.

May 27, 2004

Amendment offered

To remove the provisions relating to the law against minors in possession of alcohol.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Passed in the House 105 to 1 (details)

To require that certain criminal cases that do not result in convictions because they were processed in a drug treatment court be reported to the State Police to keep the offender's fingerprints in non-public records. These are cases involving a medical professional practicing while intoxicated.

Received in the Senate

June 1, 2004

Referred to the Committee on Judiciary

June 2, 2004

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the bill pass.

June 29, 2004

Amendment offered by Sen. Alan L. Cropsey (R-33)

To establish that if passed the bill will go into effect on Jan. 1, 2005.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)

To require that certain criminal cases that do not result in convictions because they were processed in a drug treatment court be reported to the State Police to keep the offender's fingerprints in non-public records. These are cases involving a medical professional practicing while intoxicated.

Received in the House

June 29, 2004

July 6, 2004

Passed in the House 106 to 1 (details)

To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.

Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm

July 21, 2004