2002 Senate Bill 1106 / Public Act 525

Introduced in the Senate

Feb. 13, 2002

Introduced by Sen. George McManus, Jr. (R-36)

The executive recommendation for the FY 2002-2003 Department of Natural Resources budget. This appropriates $250.9 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $253.4 million, which was the FY 2001-2002 amount enacted in 2001, excluding any supplemental appropriations. Of this, $45.5 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the current year’s $55.9 million. General Fund expenditure reductions over the past two years have been offset to some degree by a funding source shift of $4.7 million from restricted funds (license fees, trust funds, etc.). The budget also reflects a $15.5 million transfer ($2.7 million GF) to the new Department of Information Technology.

Referred to the Committee on Appropriations

March 19, 2002

Substitute offered

To replace the previous version of the bill with a version recommended by the committee which reported it. The substitute incorporates changes resulting from committee testimony and deliberation. It was amended to require the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to coordinate with local governments to combine state and federal grants for land acquisition or recreation development projects so as to minimize local matching funds. It was also amended to add approximately $700,000 for the DNR to pay its property taxes on some 900,000 acres of state land, which would avoid a plan offered by the department to pay local governments an amount less than what is owed, pro-rated on the basis of how much the department believes it has available without reducing other spending.

The substitute passed by voice vote

March 20, 2002

Amendment offered by Sen. George McManus, Jr. (R-36)

To require the Department of Natural Resources to report to the legislature on spending for bovine tuberculosis control efforts, including activities at the animal diagnostic laboratory at Michigan State University.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)

The Senate version of the FY 2002-2003 Department of Natural Resources (DNR) budget. This appropriates $253.9 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $253.4 million, which was the FY 2001-2002 amount enacted in 2001, excluding any supplemental appropriations. Of this, $47.4 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the current year’s $55.9 million. General Fund expenditure reductions over the past two years have been offset to some degree by a funding source shift of $4.7 million from restricted funds (license fees, trust funds, etc.). The budget also reflects a $15.5 million transfer ($2.7 million GF) to the new Department of Information Technology. The Senate added money for the DNR to pay its property taxes on some 900,000 acres of state land.

Received in the House

March 20, 2002

May 15, 2002

Substitute offered

To replace the Senate-passed version of the bill with a version which makes minor changes in the funding amounts, and in certain “boilerplate” language requiring or prohibiting various conditions and actions.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Substitute offered by Rep. David Mead (R-101)

To replace the Senate-passed version of the bill with a version which makes minor changes in the funding amounts, and in certain “boilerplate” language requiring or prohibiting various conditions and actions. The House added $800,000 for forest roads, bridges, and facilities construction, $400,000 for a timber marking program, and $10,000 for a study seeking a long term strategy for the treatment and mitigation of Chronic Wasting Disease in wildlife populations. The substitute also makes small changes in various line item expenditures, thereby providing a "point of difference" between the Senate- and House-passed versions of the bill. This allows House members of a likely House-Senate conference committee to negotiate these items. Unless there is a point of difference, technically a conference committee may not change a particular provision.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Passed in the House 103 to 3 (details)

The House version of the FY 2002-2003 Department of Natural Resources (DNR) budget. This appropriates $256.8 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $253.4 million, which was the FY 2001-2002 amount enacted in 2001, excluding any supplemental appropriations. Of this, $47.4 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the current year’s $55.9 million. General Fund expenditure reductions over the past two years have been offset to some degree by a funding source shift of $4.7 million from restricted funds (license fees, trust funds, etc.). The budget also reflects a $15.5 million transfer ($2.7 million GF) to the new Department of Information Technology.

Received in the Senate

May 15, 2002

May 21, 2002

Failed in the Senate 0 to 36 (details)

To concur with a House-passed version of the bill. The vote sends the bill to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences.

Received

June 18, 2002

Passed in the Senate 23 to 14 (details)

The House-Senate conference report for the FY 2002-2003 Department of Natural Resources (DNR) budget. This appropriates $254.2 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $253.4 million, which was the FY 2001-2002 amount enacted in 2001, excluding any supplemental appropriations. Of this, $43.8 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the current year’s $55.9 million. General Fund expenditure reductions over the past two years have been offset to some degree by a funding source shifts from restricted funds (license fees, trust funds, etc.). The budget also reflects a $15.5 million transfer ($2.7 million GF) to the new Department of Information Technology. The FY 2001-2002 figures do not include supplemental appropriations or cuts made by executive order later in the fiscal year.

Received in the House

June 18, 2002

June 19, 2002

Passed in the House 67 to 37 (details)

Received in the Senate

June 19, 2002

Signed with line-item veto by Gov. John Engler

July 25, 2002