Introduced
by
To prohibit local governments from imposing new licensure mandates on individuals seeking to earn a living in a particular occupation if the state already imposes its own licensure mandate on that occupation. Locals could keep their current licensure mandates but not impose any new ones. However, if the state imposes any new licensure mandates on an occupation already subject to local licensure, the local governments involved would have to stop enforcing their own restrictions on working in that field. This is part of a legislative package comprised of House Bills 5955 to 5965.
Referred to the Committee on Local Government
Reported without amendment
Without amendment and with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Amendment offered
by
To exempt local regulations that are said to "protect and promote the health and safety of the public".
The amendment failed by voice vote
Passed in the House 58 to 50 (details)
To prohibit local governments from imposing new licensure mandates on individuals seeking to earn a living in a particular occupation if the state already imposes its own licensure mandate on that occupation. Locals could keep their current licensure mandates but not impose any new ones. However, if the state imposes any new licensure mandates on an occupation already subject to local licensure, the local governments involved would have to stop enforcing their own restrictions on working in that field.
Referred to the Committee on Michigan Competitiveness
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Passed in the Senate by voice vote
To prohibit local governments from imposing new licensure mandates on individuals seeking to earn a living in a particular occupation if the state already imposes its own licensure mandate on that occupation. Locals could keep their current licensure mandates but not impose any new ones. However, if the state imposes any new licensure mandates on an occupation already subject to local licensure, the local governments involved would have to stop enforcing their own restrictions on working in that field.
Motion to reconsider
by
The vote by which the bill was passed.
The motion passed by voice vote
Received
Passed in the Senate 25 to 12 (details)
To prohibit local governments from imposing new licensure mandates on individuals seeking to earn a living in a particular occupation if the state already imposes its own licensure mandate on that occupation. Locals could keep their current licensure mandates but not impose any new ones. However, if the state imposes any new licensure mandates on an occupation already subject to local licensure, the local governments involved would have to stop enforcing their own restrictions on working in that field.
Passed in the House 59 to 50 (details)
To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.
