2011 Senate Bill 8 / Public Act 258

Authorize local government consolidated service authorities

Introduced in the Senate

Jan. 19, 2011

Introduced by Sen. Mark Jansen (R-28)

To allow and specify procedures for two or more local governments in Kent County to enter partnerships to provide particular government services, and give these the power to levy up to 5 mills of property tax. The decision to enter such a partnership would not be subject to referendum and an elected official could not be recalled for it. Details of the partnership would be a prohibited subject for collective bargaining between government employee unions and the local governments involved.

Referred to the Committee on Reforms, Restructuring, and Reinventing

June 9, 2011

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (S-3) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

June 22, 2011

Substitute offered

To adopt a version that applies to the entire state, not just Kent County, and removes a proposed prohibition on governments and their employee unions negotiating the labor contract terms of a potential consolidated authority.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Sen. Coleman Young (D-1)

To strip out a provision establishing that this proposed government service consolidation law would supersede any existing state statute or local ordinance.

The amendment failed by voice vote

Passed in the Senate 26 to 12 (details)

To allow and specify procedures for two or more local governments, and the state, to enter partnership authorities to provide particular services, and give these authorities the power to levy up to 5 mills of property tax with the approval of all voters in the affected area, even if the voters in a particular community voted against the tax. (Potentially this could be a statewide tax if the state were party to one of these agreements.) An authority agreement's terms could supersede both conflicting local ordinances and state statutes. Each member government's unions could bargain over the terms of employment of transferred employees. The decision to enter such a partnership would not be subject to referendum.

Received in the House

June 22, 2011

Referred to the Committee on Local, Intergovernmental, and Regional Affairs

June 28, 2011

Reported without amendment

Without amendment and with the recommendation that the bill pass.

Nov. 3, 2011

Amendment offered by Rep. Lisa Posthumus Lyons (R-86)

To require an authority formed to provide emergency medical services to solicit competitive bids from private sector providers for the service.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Passed in the House 72 to 35 (details)

To allow and specify procedures for two or more local governments (but not the state) to enter partnership authorities to provide particular government services; and allow an authority to impose up to 5 mills of property taxes, but only if the government bodies and voters in each jurisdiction separately approve these, and subject to statutory and constitutional caps (Headlee amendment) on each local jurisdiction’s property tax rates. An authority could supersede conflicting local ordinances, but not state statutes. The decision to enter such a partnership would not be subject to referendum. Each local government’s employee union could bargain over the terms of employment of transferred employees.

Received in the Senate

Nov. 3, 2011

Passed in the Senate 25 to 10 (details)

Signed by Gov. Rick Snyder

Dec. 13, 2011