Checkmark
Legislation watch
     

Search all years.

2019 House Bill 4186: Expand data breach response requirements
Introduced by Rep. Diana Farrington R-Sterling Heights on February 14, 2019
To clarify in a state identity theft protection law which entities are covered by the data breach response activities proposed by House Bill 4187.   Official Text and Analysis.
Referred to the House Financial Services Committee on February 14, 2019
Reported in the House on March 13, 2019
Refer to to the Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to the House Ways and Means Committee on March 13, 2019
Reported in the House on December 10, 2019
Without amendment and with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Substitute offered by Rep. Diana Farrington R-Sterling Heights on September 1, 2020
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on September 1, 2020
Substitute offered by Rep. Diana Farrington R-Sterling Heights on September 1, 2020
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on September 1, 2020
Amendment offered by Rep. Rebekah Warren D-Ann Arbor on September 1, 2020
To expand the requirements to notify the state on certain data breaches.
The amendment failed by voice vote in the House on September 1, 2020
Amendment offered by Rep. Sarah Anthony D-Lansing on September 1, 2020
To revise details of the proposed fines.
The amendment failed by voice vote in the House on September 1, 2020
Amendment offered by Rep. Matt Koleszar D-Northville on September 1, 2020
To give the state Attorney General additional powers the area of data breach disclosure requirements, and increase the proposed penalties.
The amendment failed by voice vote in the House on September 1, 2020
Received in the Senate on September 9, 2020
Referred to the Senate Regulatory Reform Committee on September 9, 2020
Reported in the Senate on December 3, 2020
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Amendment offered in the Senate on December 10, 2020
To clarify a provision that excludes from the effect of this proposed law businesses that are already subject to a state "Data Breach Notification Act".
The amendment passed by voice vote in the Senate on December 10, 2020
Received in the House on December 15, 2020
To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.
Vetoed by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer on December 30, 2020

Comments