2007 House Bill 4266

Allow consolidated government employment renegotiation

Introduced in the House

Feb. 13, 2007

Introduced by Rep. Paul Opsommer (R-93)

To revise the law authorizing the consolidation of services provided by neighboring local governments to eliminate a provision that prohibits the consolidated service from renegotiating the terms of employment of government employees, and requires existing employees to be given all their same benefits, seniority, salary, etc.

Referred to the Committee on Intergovernmental, Urban, and Regional Affairs

May 25, 2007

Substitute offered by Rep. Steve Tobocman (D-12)

To replace the previous version of the bill with one that still requires existing employees to be given all their same benefits, seniority, salary, etc., but also inserts language that nothing in the statute would require the administrative entity created under an intergovernment consolidated service agreement to pay to employees the highest wages and benefits previously paid to any of the employees, or to their preexisting union bargaining units.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Passed in the House 105 to 0 (details)

To revise the law authorizing the consolidation of services provided by neighboring local governments to establish that the administrative entity created under an intergovernment consolidated service agreement would not be required to pay to employees the highest wages and benefits previously paid to any of the employees, or to their preexisting union bargaining units. This language is inserted into the current law, but existing language requiring that existing employees be given all their same benefits, seniority, salary, etc. is not removed.

Received in the Senate

May 29, 2007

Referred to the Committee on Local, Urban, and State Affairs

July 26, 2007

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

Aug. 1, 2007

Substitute offered

To replace the previous version of the bill with one that does not include the seemingly contradictory provisions in the House-passed version, which would require local government to give existing employees all their same benefits, seniority, salary, etc., but also states that "nothing in the statute" would require this.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Sept. 12, 2007

Substitute offered by Sen. Ray Basham (D-8)

To replace the version of the bill adopted by the Senate "committee of the whole" with one that echoes the House-passed version.

Consideration postponed