Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2008 Senate Bill 1106: Appropriations: 2008-2009 Department of Natural Resources budget

Public Act 252 of 2008

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) "journal statement"  by Admin003 on June 29, 2008 
Senator Cropsey asked and was granted unanimous consent to make a statement and moved that the statement be printed in the Journal.

The motion prevailed.

Senator Cropsey’s statement is as follows:

I just wanted to thank the chair for her work on this budget. I also wanted to thank the chair for an amendment that was put on that has a comparable amendment in the Department of Environmental Quality budget.

North of town here, about 15 to 20 miles, there is a little lake called Muskrat Lake on which the Department of Natural Resources owns two-thirds to three-quarters of the shoreline. Several years ago, a boat ramp was put on Muskrat Lake, a little cement ramp, so that people could put their boats on the lake without having their trailer run into the muck. Unfortunately, over the last few years, the lake level has gone down, and the Department of Natural Resources has been negligent or dilatory in not regulating the level of the lake. One of the amendments on here says they need to give us a report by February of next year as to what they are doing to bring the lake level back up.

We have had people in the nonprofit sector willing to put a weir in so that the lake level would come back up to where it’s supposed to be. It was Ducks Unlimited that had offered to do that. At this point, they were in my office about a year ago—ten months ago—both the Department of Natural Resources and the Department of Environmental Quality. We have gone through a snowmelt, and when I went out to the lake during the snowmelt, the ramp was still completely out of the water. It’s totally inexcusable for the Department of Natural Resources to allow the natural resources of this state to be in such a negligent state of affairs.

I am putting the Department of Natural Resources on notice that they better start taking care of the property that is in their trust, especially when it’s in my district. Because they hold it in trust for the people of the state of Michigan, I am very disturbed that they have allowed this lake to get in such a state of disrepair.

Reply

Line

2) 2008 Senate Bill 1106 (Appropriations: 2008-2009 Department of Natural Resources budget )  by admin on January 1, 2001 
Introduced in the Senate on February 13, 2008, the Senate version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2008-2009 Department of Natural Resources budget. This would appropriate $274.5 million in gross spending, compared to $289.4 million, which was the FY 2007-2008 amount enrolled in 2007, and $286.9 million proposed by Gov. Granholm’s executive budget recommendation (Senate Bill 1150). Of this, $13.4 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2007-2008 amount of $25.2 million. Another $204.2 million comes from other state sources including debt, fees, royalties, etc., compared to $210.5 million in the previous budget. The lower spending of this budget compared to Gov. Granholm’s recommendation is due to shifting $14 million in payments to local governments in lieu of property taxes on state land to the Department of Treasury budget

The vote was 38 in favor, 0 opposed and 0 not voting

(Senate Roll Call 205 at Senate Journal 32)

Click here to view bill details.
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation