Introduced
by
To eliminate a cap on the amount of acres the state can own in the northern part of the state, but require additional procedures for state land acquisitions. The bill would prohibit acquisitions if the state fails to make full “payments in lieu of property taxes” (PILT) on state land to local governments. The bill revises a number of details of current law to generally facilitate access to state land for recreation and resource use, and makes a number of other changes to state management details.
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources
Amendment offered
The amendment passed by voice vote
Substitute offered
by
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
The amendment failed 12 to 25 (details)
Passed in the Senate 25 to 12 (details)
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources
Amendment offered
by
To require the forest management plans owners must adopt to get the tax break be one that "promotes the restoration and conservation of natural forests".
The amendment failed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To revise a provision of this law that provides for requests from a recreational users organization or a local government seeking the removal of a berm, gate, or other human-made barrier state land, by limiting the former to requests from a nonprofit organization.
The amendment failed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To eliminate restrictions in this law on using fish and game protection money to benefit nongame wildlife, and eliminate other provisions that essentially require forest to be managed for mixed use purposes, including economic values.
The amendment failed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To strip out a provision that allows the DNR to consider selling or exchanging land that is not designated as surplus land.
The amendment failed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require more extensive notice requirements if the DNR considers designating land as "surplus" and subject to sale or exchange.
The amendment failed by voice vote
Substitute offered
by
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 66 to 43 (details)
To eliminate a cap on the amount of acres the state can own in the northern part of the state, but require additional procedures for state land acquisitions. The bill would prohibit acquisitions if the state fails to make full “payments in lieu of property taxes” (PILT) on state land to local governments. The bill revises a number of details of current law to generally facilitate access to state land for recreation and resource use, and makes a number of other changes to state management details.
Passed in the Senate 24 to 12 (details)
To concur with the House-passed version of the bill.
