Introduced
by
To provide a “template” or “place holder” for the Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Department of Natural Resources budget. This bill contains no appropriations, but may be amended at a later date to include them.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To adopt a version of this budget that expresses the fiscal and policy preferences of the Republican-majority in the Senate.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To not use money from a state “waterways account” (to which the state constitution earmarks certain fuel tax and water-recreation related fee revenue) for boat harbor dredging and breakwalls, but instead use general fund tax revenue.
The amendment failed 13 to 23 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To add $3 million for a DNR "summer youth initiative" program.
The amendment failed 11 to 25 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To require the DNR to produce reports on the costs and benefits of spending on harbor dredging, estimates of long-term dredging costs, and the causes of Great Lakes erosion and sedimentation.
The amendment failed 13 to 23 (details)
Passed in the Senate 26 to 10 (details)
The Senate version of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment budget for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1, 2013. This would appropriate $339.8 million in gross spending, compared to $337.8 million, which was the FY 2012-2013 amount enrolled in 2012. Of this, $67.1 million is federal money, and the rest is from state taxes, fees, fines, royalties, etc..
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Substitute offered
by
To adopt a version of the budget that contains no appropriations, but is instead intended to launch negotiations to work out the differences between the House and Senate budgets.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 60 to 48 (details)
To send the bill back to the Senate "stripped" of all actual appropriations. This vote is basically a procedural method of launching negotiations to work out the differences between the House and Senate budgets.
Failed in the Senate 0 to 38 (details)
To concur with a House-passed version of the bill. The vote sends the bill to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences.
Received
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
