2012 Senate Bill 1059

Expand forest property tax breaks

Introduced in the Senate

March 29, 2012

Introduced by Sen. Darwin Booher (R-35)

To expand the eligibility for certain forest property tax breaks, and require owners seeking one to get one of the 79 government “conservation district” authorities in the state to “verify implementation” of a management plan required for these tax breaks.

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, Environment, and Great Lakes

June 12, 2012

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

Sept. 19, 2012

Substitute offered

The substitute passed by voice vote

Sept. 20, 2012

Passed in the Senate 38 to 0 (details)

To expand the eligibility for certain forest property tax breaks, increase the size of the tax breaks to owners, double the number of acres eligible for the exemption from 1.2 million to 2.4 million statewide, and require owners seeking one to get local “conservation district” authorities to “verify implementation” of a management plan required for these tax breaks.

Received in the House

Sept. 20, 2012

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, Tourism, and Outdoor Recreation

Received in the Senate

Nov. 29, 2012

Motion to reconsider by Sen. Arlan Meekhof (R-30)

The vote by which the bill was passed.

The motion passed by voice vote

Substitute offered by Sen. Darwin Booher (R-35)

To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance as previously described.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Passed in the Senate 38 to 0

To expand the eligibility for certain forest property tax breaks, increase the size of the tax breaks to owners, double the number of acres eligible for the exemption from 1.2 million to 2.4 million statewide, and also impose a new 2 mill property tax on property in this program that would go to proposed "Private Forestland Enhancement Fund" to subsidize private forestland management activities.

Received in the House

Nov. 29, 2012

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, Tourism, and Outdoor Recreation

Dec. 4, 2012

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.