2010 House Bill 5875 / Public Act 166

Appropriations: 2010-2011 Agriculture budget

Introduced in the House

Feb. 24, 2010

Introduced by Rep. John Espinoza (D-83)

The executive recommendation for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Agriculture budget. This would appropriate $77.6 million in gross spending, compared to $84.6 million, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $15.7 million will come from the federal government, compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $15.5 million.

Referred to the Committee on Appropriations

March 23, 2010

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

March 25, 2010

Substitute offered

The Appropriations Committee substitute. This was bypassed in favor of a version that contains additional changes in a few line items.

The substitute failed by voice vote

Substitute offered by Rep. John Espinoza (D-83)

To adopt a version of this budget that expresses the fiscal and policy preferences of the Democratic-majority in the House on various spending items and programs. For details see <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2009-2010/billanalysis/House/pdf/2009-HLA-5875-4.pdf">analysis</a> from the non-partisan House Fiscal Agency.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Matt Lori (R-59)

To cut the department employee payroll line item by the amount that would be saved if the legislature rejected a 3 percent state employee pay hike scheduled to go into effect on Oct. 1, 2010. The Senate <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2009-HCR-34">tried</a> to reject the pay hike and came up three votes short; the House leadership chose not to bring up <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2009-HCR-34">the measure</a> for a vote.

The amendment failed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Matt Lori (R-59)

To establish as "the intent of the legislature" that forest management and timber market development programs currently under the authority of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment be transferred to the Michigan Department of Agriculture, and state land timber harvests increased.

The amendment failed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Matt Lori (R-59)

To require the department to post on the internet a listing of all expenditures, including federal "stimulus" money, with the purpose of each (a "check register").

The amendment passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. George Cushingberry (D-8)

To prohibit the department from spending more than $10,000 to implement the "check register" provision proposed by the Lori amendment that was adopted.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. John Espinoza (D-83)

To require the Department to find ways to reduce the amount of general fund revenue used to support its operations by 3 percent.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Passed in the House 61 to 48 (details)

The House version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Agriculture budget. This would appropriate $77.2 million in gross spending, compared to $84.6 million, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $14.7 million will come from the federal government, compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $15.5 million.

Received in the Senate

April 14, 2010

Referred to the Committee on Appropriations

May 11, 2010

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

May 12, 2010

Substitute offered

To adopt a version of this budget that expresses the fiscal and policy preferences of the Republican-majority in the Senate on various spending items and programs. For details see <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2009-2010/billanalysis/Senate/pdf/2009-SFA-5875-U.pdf">analysis</a> from the non-partisan Senate Fiscal Agency.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Passed in the Senate 38 to 0 (details)

The Senate version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Agriculture budget. This would appropriate $76.2 million in gross spending, compared to $84.6 million, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $14.7 million will come from the federal government, compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $15.5 million.

Received in the House

May 19, 2010

To concur with a Senate-passed version of the bill. The vote sends the bill to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences.

Failed in the House 0 to 107 (details)

Sept. 15, 2010

Received

The House-Senate conference report for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Department of Agriculture budget. This would appropriate $76.4 million in gross spending, compared to $84.6 million, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $14.9 million will come from the federal government, and the rest from state taxes and fees.

Passed in the House 78 to 26 (details)

Received in the Senate

Sept. 16, 2010

Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)

Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm

Sept. 23, 2010