2009 House Bill 4549

“Corporate Responsibility” standards for state tax breaks & contracts

Introduced in the House

March 10, 2009

Introduced by Rep. Marie Donigan (D-26)

To require before entering any contract with a private company the state to consider whether the work will be performed or goods produced outside the country and if this is in the best interests of the state and its people; whether the firm, its managers and owners (with at least a 20 percent share) have been guilty of a criminal offense incident to a state contract; been held liable in a criminal or civil proceeding for embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, receiving stolen property, or violation of state or federal antitrust statutes. The company would have to affirm whether it is incorporated in a "tax haven country" and whether it is to the violation of "internationally recognized workers rights".

Referred to the Committee on Commerce

March 18, 2010

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Investigations

March 24, 2010

Reported without amendment

Substitute offered

To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance as previously described.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Jase Bolger (R-63)

To tie-bar the bill to House Bills 4335 and 4969, meaning this bill cannot become law unless those ones do also. Those bills would require personnel agencies to verify the citizenship status of all job applicants with the federal “E-verification” real-time program, and repeal the “gun free zone” provision of the concealed pistol permit law.

The amendment failed by voice vote

Passed in the House 107 to 2 (details)

To require, before entering any contract with a private company, the state to consider whether the work will be performed or goods produced outside the country, and if this is in the best interests of the state and its people; whether the firm, its managers and owners (with at least a 20 percent share) have been guilty of a criminal offense incident to a state contract; been held liable in a criminal or civil proceeding for embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, receiving stolen property, or violation of state or federal antitrust statutes. The company would have to affirm whether it is incorporated in a "tax haven country" and whether it is to the violation of "internationally recognized workers rights".

Received in the Senate

April 14, 2010

Referred to the Committee on Finance