Introduced
by
To extend for another two years the higher costs charged for a number of court filing fees and assessments that under current law would be reduced on Oct. 1, 2005.
Referred to the Committee on Local, Urban, and State Affairs
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the bill pass.
Substitute offered
by
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To clarify the distribution of certain fee revenue if a judicial district does not have a drug court.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 99 to 5 (details)
To extend for another two years the higher costs charged for a number of court filing fees and assessments that under current law would be reduced on Oct. 1, 2005.
Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)
To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.
