Introduced
by
To revise certain village election dates allowed or required in the transition to the new election consolidation law created by House Bills 4820 to 4828 and Senate Bill 877. The bill does not change the system created by that law of all elections in the state taking place on one of four days throughout the year, but does give villages more flexibility in selecting among the four dates. This is part of a legislative package making technical changes to the new system, which begins Jan. 1, 2005.
Referred to the Committee on Local Government and Urban Policy
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 106 to 1 (details)
Referred to the Committee on Government Operations and Reform
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the bill pass.
Amendment offered
To allow villages to adopt a method of changing from 2-year staggered terms of council members to 4-year staggered terms.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)
To revise certain village election dates allowed or required in the transition to the new election consolidation law created by House Bills 4820 to 4828 and Senate Bill 877. The bill does not change the system created by that law of all elections in the state taking place on one of four days throughout the year, but does give villages more flexibility in selecting among the four dates. This is part of a legislative package making technical changes to the new system, which begins Jan. 1, 2005.
Passed in the House 101 to 1 (details)
To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.
