2003 Senate Bill 657 / 2004 Public Act 462

Restrict use of consumer social security number

Introduced in the Senate

Aug. 13, 2003

Introduced by Sen. Cameron Brown (R-16)

To prohibit requiring a consumer to disclose his or her social security number as a condition of making a retail purchase of goods or services that does not involve an extension of credit. The bill is part of a legislative package comprised of Senate Bills 220, 657, 792, 793, 795, 797, 798, 803 and House Bills 6168 to 6177.

Referred to the Committee on Judiciary

Dec. 2, 2003

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the amendment be adopted and that the bill then pass.

Dec. 9, 2003

Amendment offered

To provide an exception to the prohibition proposed by the bill for transactions involving the administration of a health-related benefit provided by an employer. This exception is required due to a new federal medical records "privacy" law. The amendment would also move back the date the bill goes into effect.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Dec. 10, 2003

Passed in the Senate 38 to 0 (details)

To prohibit requiring a consumer to disclose his or her social security number as a condition of making a retail purchase of goods or services that does not involve an extension of credit, except where required under federal law for transactions involving the administration of a health-related benefit provided by an employer.

Received in the House

Dec. 10, 2003

Referred to the Committee on Criminal Justice

Sept. 15, 2004

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (H-3) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

Sept. 29, 2004

Substitute offered

To replace the previous version of the bill with one that includes additional exceptions required for legitimate commercial transactions and background checks. See House-passed bill for details.

The substitute failed by voice vote

Substitute offered by Rep. William Van Regenmorter (R-74)

To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Passed in the House 106 to 0 (details)

To prohibit requiring a consumer to disclose his or her social security number as a condition of making a retail purchase of goods or services that does not involve an extension of credit, except for certain health care transactions, for background checks by a landlord, for getting a credit report that is not otherwise prohibited, or where required by law.

Received in the Senate

Sept. 30, 2004

Nov. 10, 2004

Substitute offered by Sen. Cameron Brown (R-16)

To replace the previous version of the bill with one that also prohibits the display by a merchant of more than the last four digits of a customer’s credit or debit card account number, or the card’s expiration date on a merchandise receipt.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)

To prohibit requiring a consumer to disclose his or her social security number as a condition of making a retail purchase of goods or services that does not involve an extension of credit, except for certain health care transactions, for background checks by a landlord, for getting a credit report that is not otherwise prohibited, or where required by law. Also, to prohibit the display by a merchant of more than the last four digits of a customer’s credit or debit card account number, or the card’s expiration date on a merchandise receipt.

Received in the House

Nov. 10, 2004

Dec. 2, 2004

Amendment offered by Rep. William Van Regenmorter (R-74)

To exempt over-the-phone or Internet transactions from the proposed prohibition on requiring a buyer to give an social security number (SSN) to purchase consumer goods, if the buyer's SSN is requested as an optional way to verify his or her identity in order to expedite or make the transaction more convenient.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Passed in the House 95 to 0 (details)

To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill, with an amendment added.

Received in the Senate

Dec. 7, 2004

Passed in the Senate 35 to 0 (details)

To concur with the House-passed version of the bill.

Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm

Dec. 27, 2004