2003 Senate Bill 239 / Public Act 94

Introduced in the Senate

Feb. 27, 2003

Introduced by Sen. Tom George (R-20)

To allow a county to grant or loan funds not derived from property taxes to a nonprofit corporation organized to subsidize economic development loans. See Senate Bill 240.

Referred to the Committee on Local, Urban, and State Affairs

March 18, 2003

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

March 19, 2003

Substitute offered

To replace the previous version of the bill with one which requires that the criteria for the proposed subsidy grants be disclosed, that there be public notice, and that there be a specific statement of the public purpose for the funding. Grants could only be awarded in a public county commission meeting, and recipients would be required to file annual reports on the extent to which their activities have met the stated public purpose.

The substitute passed by voice vote

March 20, 2003

Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)

To allow a county to grant or loan any funds not derived from property taxes to a nonprofit corporation organized to subsidize economic development loans. Current law only allows the use of federal, state, or local grants for this purpose. The bill requires that grants or loans be awarded in a public county commission meeting according to an official process, and requires recipients to file annual reports on the extent to which their activities have met the stated public purpose. See also Senate Bill 240, and House Bills 4300 and 4324.

Received in the House

March 20, 2003

Referred to the Committee on Local Government and Urban Policy

April 9, 2003

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

May 1, 2003

Substitute offered

To replace the previous version of the bill with one which allows the source of the funds used for the grants or loans to be property taxes levied specifically for economic development purposes.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. RuthAnn Jamnick (D-54)

To clarify that if the source of the funds used for the grants or loans is property taxes levied specifically for economic development purposes, the tax must have been approved by a vote of the people. Property taxes explicitly levied for economic development purposes are an exception to a prohibition in this statute on using ad valorem taxes for these loans or grants.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Passed in the House 96 to 9 (details)

To allow a county to grant or loan funds derived from property taxes levied specifically for economic development purposes and approved by a vote of the people, to a nonprofit corporation organized to subsidize economic development loans. Current law only allows the use of federal, state, or local grants for this purpose, not property tax revenues. The bill requires that grants or loans be awarded according to an official processin a public county commission meeting, and requires recipients to file annual reports on the extent to which their activities have met the stated public purpose. See also Senate Bill 240, and House Bills 4300 and 4324.

Received in the Senate

July 2, 2003

Amendment offered by Sen. Ray Basham (D-8)

To require that nonprofit corporations receiving the government loans authorized by the law the bill amends be subject to the Freedom Of Information Act.

The amendment failed 15 to 21 (details)

Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)

To concur with the House-passed version of the bill.

Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm

July 24, 2003