2003 House Bill 4742 / 2004 Public Act 330

Impose minimum court cost parole condition

Introduced in the House

May 22, 2003

Introduced by Rep. Charles LaSata (R-79)

To impose a minimum state court cost assessment as a condition of probation for those convicted in criminal cases.

Referred to the Committee on Judiciary

Sept. 9, 2004

Substitute offered by Rep. Jim Howell (R-94)

To replace the previous version of the bill with one that also authorizes additional fees or parole conditions in cases where sentencing os delayed or deferred.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Amendment offered by Rep. Jim Howell (R-94)

To move back the date the bill goes into effect, and make other technical changes.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Passed in the House 105 to 0 (details)

To impose a minimum state court cost assessment as a condition of probation for those convicted in criminal cases, and also authorize additional fees or parole conditions in cases where sentencing os delayed or deferred.

Received in the Senate

Sept. 14, 2004

Referred to the Committee on Judiciary

Sept. 15, 2004

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (S-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

Substitute offered

To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described.

The substitute passed by voice vote

Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)

To impose a minimum state court cost assessment as a condition of probation for those convicted in criminal cases, and also authorize additional fees or parole conditions in cases where sentencing os delayed or deferred.

Received in the House

Sept. 15, 2004

Passed in the House 101 to 4 (details)

To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.

Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm

Sept. 22, 2004