Michigan Votes Forum

we understand that you don't care. but what makes you think that this bill is misguided? shouldn't citizens who wish to run obey the rules for running?

if there were logic, i wouldn't have to ask the question. how is that question provocative? the topic is whether or not animal sodomites should be placed on sexual offender lists. you haven't answered the basic question on your views of the basic premise of the thread. and, according to the question, the crime is not animal cruelty, it is animal

no, it doesn't make my head explode. but i do feel that there may be some hope for you yet. and i'm very calm, thank you.

so do you believe that the crime of animal abuse deserves to be continually punished by being placed forever on some list?

let's make the license to do business in the state of michigan cost fifty dollars. let's make the form to fill out to do business in michigan one page long. let's make public health inspections (for restaurants, diners, food processing plants, etc) cost fifty dollars and be re-done yearly and one inspection a year at random. let's have

it's not a statement, trueblue, it's a question. a very simple question. a civil question. one deserving of an answer. right to work has neither destroyed unions, nor 'screwed the working person' anywhere it has been implemented. rights are protected as they have always been, by law, not by some paid union watchdog. what right to work

a few facts about socialism, democratic or otherwise. there are no successful socialist countries. there never have been any successful socialist countries. there never will be any successful socialist countries. with these facts in mind, i wonder where our friend trueblue is getting all of his statements about socialism curing cancer and landing on

i thought beastiality was supposed to be a very heinous crime. peta will soon drive the direction of our entire government, if we let them.

so why haven't i? and while we are at it, why haven't you? don't you have an opinion as to what patriotism is?

it addresses a real problem but doesn't go far enough. there is no purpose to license a handgun. we have a right to own and bear it, guaranteed by two constitutions, not just one. a license is simply state permission.