Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 04-16-2010 9:43 AM by FreeSpeaker. 4 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (5 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    2010 House Bill 6025 (Create potential income tax hike “placeholder” bill )

    Introduced in the House on March 25, 2010

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 04-02-2010 11:02 AM In reply to

    Re: 2010 House Bill 6025 (Create potential income tax hike “placeholder” bill )

    Good.  If there's one thing Michigan needs, it's a hike in income taxes.  Whatever you people do, do NOT reduce spending.  I'm sure every cent spent by MI state government has been examined for its absolute necessity and thus all unnecessary or wasteful spending has already been eliminated.

  • 04-04-2010 10:48 AM In reply to

    Re: 2010 House Bill 6025 (Create potential income tax hike “placeholder” bill )

    Minnie:

    Good.  If there's one thing Michigan needs, it's a hike in income taxes.  Whatever you people do, do NOT reduce spending.  I'm sure every cent spent by MI state government has been examined for its absolute necessity and thus all unnecessary or wasteful spending has already been eliminated.

    Public spending and public employment have been reduced in Michigan, although many people choose to ignore that fact.  Nonetheless, the cost of doing basic business continues to rise.  (Have you looked at fuel prices lately, for example?)

    What Michigan needs is a sensible tax policy.  Big breaks for business have not kept businesses in the state -- that's a failed policy.  Excise taxes -- sales and fuel taxes -- are incapable of producing revenues to cover rising costs.  In fact, as costs rise, consumption and tax collections decline.  So those are failed tax policies, too.  Moreover, excise taxes unfairly burden those least able to afford the hit.

    A sensible tax policy would provide, among other things, that every legislative bill that entails government expenditures (and most do in one way or another) includes provision for raising revenue to cover those expenses, or it cannot become law.  In other words, adopt a pay-as-we-go approach.  That is fiscal conservatism.

    A sensible tax policy also would increase income tax rates.   The most sensible thing to do is amend the Michigan Constitution to allow for a steeply graduated income tax, in order to protect lower and middle income individuals, families and businesses from being overburdened.

     

  • 04-04-2010 4:49 PM In reply to

    Re: 2010 House Bill 6025 (Create potential income tax hike “placeholder” bill )

     Tim Melton is a typical tax and spender. So I am not shocked or surprised that this "Progressive" would think up a bill that would take open up the ability to rip off more of the taxpayers discretionary income to fatten Lansings pockets, thus leaving less to contribute to the private sector.  When are the people going to wake-up and stop voting yahoo's like Melton in? 

     

  • 04-16-2010 9:43 AM In reply to

    Re: 2010 House Bill 6025 (Create potential income tax hike “placeholder” bill )

    inform4:

     Tim Melton is a typical tax and spender. So I am not shocked or surprised that this "Progressive" would think up a bill that would take open up the ability to rip off more of the taxpayers discretionary income to fatten Lansings pockets, thus leaving less to contribute to the private sector.  When are the people going to wake-up and stop voting yahoo's like Melton in? 

    So just what has the "private sector" done for the people of Michigan lately?  Last I looked it was the private sector that pulled the plug on the Michigan job market, led the charge to cut wages and slash employee benefits, etc..  And it was the "private sector" that left so many Michigan people with hugely depleted personal savings, while a few private sector fat cats lined their own pockets with everbody else's "lost" wealth.

    When are the people going to stop voting for stooges who work feverishly in office to abet privater sector exploitation of the populace and plunder of the economy?

     

     

     

     

     

Page 1 of 1 (5 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems