It is objectionable to have someone appointed to the committee who is recommended by the Michigan Humane Society. MHS has links to HSUS that are anti-agriculture, anti-livestock farming, and anti-meat.
The bill does protect famers by stating that ALL standards must be scientifically based.
It would also be extremely objectionable to have Michigan Humane Society appointed as the "third-party auditor" to which fees would be paid by the farmers for the certification inspections. This is objectional for the above reasons of their connection to and promotion of HSUS through their numerous links on the MHS website. These fees are undetermined and are supposed to cover the cost of inspection. Exactly how much would or should that be? You can bet that if any so-called "humane society" is involved those fees will be excessive and subject to increase every year - with the intention of making livestock farming input costs higher and hopefully drive some people out of livestock farming.
It would be more reasonable to have the third-party auditor be a veterinarian who has a scientific background and is free from the bias of MHS employees and their versions of "humane animal care."