Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 05-10-2011 6:52 PM by polarbear. 10 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (11 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

    Introduced in the House on January 22, 2009

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 02-13-2009 2:47 PM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

     

    House bill #4061 must pass, its time to end the incarceration of innocent men by the means of indentured servitude.

     

    For more details of how important, the passage of this bill really is please visit

     

    www.lawliars.com

     

     

     

    Filed under:
  • 02-13-2009 4:58 PM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

     a d.n.a. test should be the first order of business in a paternity dispute. it helps clear up who is lying to whom. if the NAMED father is not the ACTUAL father, that person should be sent on his merry way, and the woman who LIED TO THE COURT should be fined and imprisoned.

    to do anything else is unethical, dishonest, and SHOULD BE ILLEGAL.

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 02-16-2009 6:11 PM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

     this bill should MANDATE termination of child support, with a full refund if the d.n.a. test shows that there is no paternity.

    to do any less is THEFT.

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 03-09-2009 12:20 PM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

    This house bill has been going on and on, slavery its unlawful to force a man/or husband to child support for a child NOT his.

    If ya notice this bill has tricky wording,like -"Relief from child support with dna, will be denied,if a man knew child was Not his 6months before or after DNA test."       How about a add rule "Women/ who knew a Man/husband is NOT a father of child before or after 6month shall be denied child support payments unless a DNA test is given,or the REAL father is found""""""

    SLAVERY IS UNLAWFUL-slavery is when a person works for another persons duty. DNA test , freedom, if a women can get a man to pay after 6 years of waiting hunting, then a innocent husband should be relief of "slavery" after 6 years.  Equal justice rights.

  • 03-09-2009 12:50 PM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

     

    Lets observe this from another end of the spectrum, A father, biological or not can be charged with felony non payment and child abandonment and sentenced to jail or prison for up to four years, and this happens on a daily basis.

     

    The mothers in PATERNITY FRAUD Cases, such as mine should immediately charged with perjury and unjust enrichment by the means of extrotion. They should also be ordered to repay all monies plus interest received by the Fraud and enforced by the courts until the balance is paid in full. Let this mother sell their cars and homes; give up any retirement they may have accumulated and see what accountability really means.

    That is Justice.

    Filed under:
  • 03-09-2009 12:57 PM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

     money earned by fraud is the profit of a crime. fraud is illegal per se. prosecute it to the fullest extent of the law.

  • 11-03-2010 7:16 AM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

     I totally agree with this bill, and Wayne County should not allow "COPIED" paternity tests' results to be used as evidence either. Again, we have psychopathic people out here that would do anything for money if they can get away with it.  I asked that you remand cases, Parker, K vs. Anderson, S to be investigated and retried.

  • 12-12-2010 2:53 PM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

     Lenawee county said if I sign as father and he was not mine it would be like an adoption! I would have to pay reguardless of a later test.  That would make me pay for someone elses kid.  Thats $100,000 plus that was not my debt.  The reason that this has not passed is it creates more Government.  We know its wrong but they (govt) dont care.  How can they charge you in Ohio etc. for a driving offence because it happened there(that makes since) but then make you repay in michigan again for the same offence.  Thats double jeperty.  One crime charged twice! Its wrong but it makes them MONEY !!! So they will not fix it.  Same goes with this.

  • 12-13-2010 5:49 AM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )


    Hi Friend,
    It is a great blog, all the pictures are really amazing, it shows the professionalism in photography.

    ===========chocolate

     

    Filed under:
  • 05-10-2011 6:52 PM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

    South Dakota grandparents rights serves the best interest of the children-  In 25-4-52 25-4-54 laws

    AMEND ADOPTION CODE LAWS OF MICHIGAN   ADD ON TO 710.56 (6)

    (6) EXCEPT IF A CHILD IS ADOPTED BY A MATERNAL OR PATERNAL GRANDPARENT, THIS DOES NOT PROHIBIT EITHER GRANDPARENT IN THE 1ST. DEGREE TO PETITION FOR VISITATION OF GRANDCHILD.

    THIS NEW LAW WILL, BENIFIT THE CHILDREN- AND STATE, IT WILL GIVE CHILDREN LOVING BOND, MONEY WISE IT WILL SAVE STATE MILLION OF DOLLARES, KEEP CHILDREN OUT OF ,FOSTER CARE, AND DANGERS. MANY STATES HAVE CHANGED THEIR ADOPTION CODES TO ADD-ON AMENDMENTS TO EQUAL RIGHTS TO BOTH GRANDPARENTS.

    MICHIGAN FAILED TO PASS A A CORRECT LAW- THEY VOTED -JUST TO GET IT DONE- GOVERNOR SIGN IT - PROBABLY DIDNOT READ IT- THIS NEW LAW WE IN "NO WAY" INPUT INTO "PARENTS RIGHTS" AND IT DID NOT DO SO IN 2003, BUT CONGRESS JUST SIMPLY LEFT OUT THE PART- SMALL PRINT OF WORDS OF """EXCEPT IF A  CHILD IS ADOPTED BY GRANDPARENT THIS DOES NOT PROHIBIT VISITATION OF A GRANDPARENTS"" THE WORD EXCEPT"" HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH PARENTS RIGHTS.

    GRANDPARENTS ALL OVER T UNITED STATES- AARP- VETERANS- SUPPORTED THE "'EXCEPT IF ADOPTED BY GRANDPARENTS.

    WE AS GRANPARENTS ARE BEING UNITED ONCE AGAIN TO DEMAND "CONGRESS" IN EVERY STATE" TO REWRITE ADOPTION CODE LAWS- """ AMEND ADOPTION CODE- "EXCEPT IF A CHILD IS ADOPTED BY A MATERNAL OR PATERNAL GRANDPARENT THIS DOES NOT PROHIBIT VISITATION BY EITHER GRANDPARENT IN THE 1ST.DEGREE.""

     

     

Page 1 of 1 (11 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems