Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 03-11-2008 10:08 AM by Anonymous Citizen. 5 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (6 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    • admin
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 11-22-2008

    2007 House Bill 4923 (Distribute food stamps on twice-a-month basis )

    Introduced in the House on June 14, 2007

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 06-28-2007 11:12 PM In reply to

    Totally makes sense

    It's a problem.
  • 02-25-2008 3:32 AM In reply to

    waste of money

    The policy change would impose one-time costs on the Department of Human Services related to information technology systems changes needed to implement the change and staff time needed to respond to recipient inquiries that would likely result from the policy change. Information from the Department of Human Services suggests that the information technology systems costs would be around $900,000. The additional increase in staff time and costs would depend upon the number of recipient inquiries that resulted from the policy change and the required follow-up time from DHS staff. For reference, in September 2007, the DHS issued food assistance benefits to 565,588 recipient groups representing 1,217,334 individuals, so a significant workload impact is possible.
  • 03-11-2008 9:17 AM In reply to

    A farm bill being negotiated in Congress could block such a move, It includes a provision that would ban states from changing food-stamp distribution from once a month.
  • 03-11-2008 9:27 AM In reply to

    Lets

    do away with the farm bill also
  • 03-11-2008 10:08 AM In reply to

    how about we just

    stop issuing food stamps altogether. why not, instead, use some of those forclosed houses to put them in. have them grow a garden to supply their own food, have them dig a well to supply their own water, have them dig a septic tank to supply their own waste treatment, and let them 'live and let live'? they would owe the total of the property after ten years, or they would be forcefully evicted. they have THAT LONG to become successful.
Page 1 of 1 (6 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems