|
-
01-01-2001 12:00 AM
|
|
-
Votes Admin


- Joined on 09-09-2008
|
2007 House Bill 4921 (Revise repeat drunk driver offence penalties )
Introduced in the House on June 13, 2007, to require the Secretary of State to suspend the drivers license and require an alcohol detection ignition interlock device of a person who has prior convictions and is convicted of drunk driving. If the person has one prior conviction within seven years, a suspension would up to two years and the interlock device would have to be installed for at least two years; if two prior convictions, up to a three year suspension and the device installed for three years; if three prior convictions, up to a five year suspension and the device installed for five years. The first 45 days would be a “hard suspension” (not even allowed to drive to work). Under current law, the "hard suspension" for repeat offenders is one year, but the bill's mandated interlock period provisions do not apply The vote was 107 in favor, 0 opposed and 3 not voting (House Roll Call 472 at House Journal 107) Click here to view bill details.
|
|
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
What is Crime? What is Punishment?
"2015" wish you the best! I am allowed to request a SS hearing after march 03, 2008. stopped consuming march 20, 1999 or the day after my third 0.14. (1983 0.14, 1992 0.14) stopped to remove light covers, turned lights off, received assistance.. sobriety is a life experience. three cost me job, 40th in jail whats wrong with this picture? Me.. not drinking after 20 drinking? how about not. No work eight years no license no job. no job no need for license I vividly get this picture. Made the mistake of driving, left turn after 40 year intersection re-designed, sober, five years added, would have got the same punishment if I was drunk. Oh yah, single luckely no others suffering cept 80 year old parents that have to drive their unemployed 49 year old around. Used to teach problem solving, easely applied to my life. Step 1 List problem completely. Step 2 List all possible solutions/options, best to worse. Step 3 apply best. Step 4 evaluate. Problem solved? if not, next solution and so on. I have no options or solution. Welfare good luck? Jail I could get three squares, clean clothes, cable, internet, have a real life. What crime against society should I commit this time surely it might be one where I could possibly have my debt viewed as payed in full and nothing to do with alcohol. No, I dont think so I'll just live in a box on the corner or a nice dumpster.
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
"SUB-STANCE abuse. taking a stance for a nother chance
I so much agree especially in Michigan where there is "NO MASS TRANSPORTATION" bad economy, but yeah lots of sports and will they care about the injured workers and players who don't know how to manage their pain after YEARS of bodily abuse what Michigan cares about the most (abuse) of people's lives ,athletes and workers as long as they can perform, and when they run into physical difficulties and use pain killers, then they wipe their hands of it, and come up with laws to so call protect the public-- the select public. I SO MUCH AGREE
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
Page 1 of 1 (14 items)
|
|
|