Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 03-25-2008 10:37 PM by Anonymous Citizen. 9 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (10 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    2007 House Bill 4566 (Authorize repayment of child support obtained by fraud or misrepresentation )

    Introduced in the House on April 5, 2007

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 04-06-2007 1:56 PM In reply to

    Great Job

    Hats off to you Rep John Stakoe, this is why you belong in office.
  • 04-06-2007 7:08 PM In reply to

    Its about time!

    You are the trendsetter--Thank you--Please pass this bill. Fraud is a crime, and should be punished as such--payment to the victim is the right thing to do.
  • 04-06-2007 9:35 PM In reply to

    Go even further....

    Not only should the CP have to repay the NCP for fraudulent DS received, the CP and the NCP should also have to submit copies of their household bills. The monies for CS should only be used for things for the child. Show where food, utilities, etc. is being spent. BOTH parents have to have things for the children and the CS charged in most cases allows some CP's to buy frivoulous things while the NCP goes bankrupt. FIX THE FOC, PLEASE!!
  • 04-15-2007 6:16 PM In reply to

    Go After FOC

    Not only should the CP be ordered to re-pay support overpayment thourgh fraud, but the FOC employees who "calculate" the order should also be held accountable. Then there is the Judge who refuses to follow Court rules and guidelines "because they don't have to"...The staggering list goes on and on.
  • 04-30-2007 6:38 PM In reply to

    Greed

    When my boyfriend and I were together, I watched his and his ex-wife's child while they worked during the day. During that time, he was (stupidly, I admit) paying her under the table. Now that he and I have a child together, I am unable to receive CS from his check because she collects $350 per week back CS under a FRAUDULENT child care claim. SHE never paid ME a cent to watch her kid, yet she can claim she had child care expenses she should be reimbursed for by him? WHY doesn't she have to show child care expenses to the court? If I were to go down to FIA and apply for child care payments, I would HAVE to show hours worked, who I paid, how much I paid, and when I paid. I am a woman, and I feel awful that our FOC system is so screwed that it doesn't allow my child's father to help us out, while she makes almost two grand in support from him PLUS her own earnings. She has even admitted to spending her child's money on barbeque grills ($600), a new phone for her boyfriend ($200), her NEW 2007 Ford Explorer payments...This court system allows greedy women to play the system to their advantage, and it needs to be stopped.
  • 03-25-2008 10:34 PM In reply to

    kewxlr puley

    bljiayqnk geskmtoc qthrlyxf necdl azifwvrl lsuof xtuelr
  • 03-25-2008 10:34 PM In reply to

    oxunevt zomjbvirf

    rkhe pjhozius oryz arwdj rnsav tdvfxpcka hrsqafo http://www.mxtzo.dkwo.com
  • 03-25-2008 10:37 PM In reply to

    cimpnray vaponmel

    tesvw vtrolhs njkvb mviw khwucqob nfuoev hrmve [URL=http://www.wcdmxeavs.rota.com]awrxmpldn fynjklzgx[/URL]
  • 03-25-2008 10:37 PM In reply to

    hbgp kfng

    pgszwhefj nmkqwldjz aynwi zfhe csgbkv bnjrkxdyw qtezulxgr [URL]http://www.arhfnqmoy.ogadx.com[/URL] jlmycq uivjr
Page 1 of 1 (10 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems