|
-
01-01-2001 12:00 AM
|
|
-
Votes Admin


- Joined on 09-09-2008
|
2007 House Bill 4536 (Expand auto child seat mandates )
Introduced in the House on March 28, 2007, to require child safety booster seats for children between four- and eight-years old who are under 4-feet 9-inches tall The vote was 101 in favor, 7 opposed and 2 not voting (House Roll Call 232 at House Journal 66) Click here to view bill details.
|
|
-
-
-
-
batran


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
In an era of historic economic crisis, our elected officials have, brilliantly, devised a viable substitute to an increase of taxation to sustain the state.
This piece of legislation should be considered the beginning of a new dawn in the generation of revenue without taxation. Allow me to explain:
The 2 cent service taxation may have been unmitigated for a bait and switch for fines. Since families are subjected to intrusive governmental regulation as an institutional norm, it only makes sense to perpetuate the only secured source of federal funding: Social Security Title IV-E.
When the ticket is issued for not adhering to the safety of a child, this will be cross listed as child endagerment, or more readily recognized as "child neglect". At this point the federal funds begin pouring in for the removal and placement of the child to the safe and protective custody of the state. An array of therapeutic counseling and conditioning would be institued, all the while fueling job security for the bevy of unlicensed and untrained state contracted social workers.
The unregulated insurance industry would perpetuate the annual incremental trend of increased insurance rates, as a result of the fines.
I am so proud of our elected, sophisticated officials to focus on the statistically insignificant recorded incidents of child injuries within the established variable for this legislation. I am so happy to see my federal tax dollars at work to revitalize the economy.
I can only ask for all citizens to give a standing ovation to the concert of concern for the "best interests" of our children. The straw man has yet to sing!
Encore! Let's continue with fining parents for being impoverished. Oops, Michigan already did.
Beverly Tran
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Are you really that STUPID??
Michigan is one of a few states that does not mandate a child be in a safety seat after the age of 4. A child is not meant to be in an adult seat belt. There have been many children killed due to being in an adult seat belt. What they are doing is for the safety of YOUR child in YOUR car. The seat belt cuts across their neck, you get in a serious wreck and that child is likely to be decapitated. Do your research on why it is important for a child to be in at least a booster seat after the age of 4. It's not a baby seat, but a seat that boosts them up so that the adult seat belt doesn't KILL THEM. Oh yeah you'll be the ones complaining about why you didn't follow the law when your child gets killed in a crash.
|
|
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
so, when they pull you over
and jail you for NOT having the car seat up to date, and you have to pay thousands in DRIVER RESPONSIBILITY FEES i'm willing to bet you won't be feeling so benign about government intrusion.
|
|
-
-
-
suppressed american


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
you should run for prosecuting attorney..
hell, run for attorney general. you would make a good replacement for mike cox.
he believes if you can't pay child support because you can't find a job. you should lose your licence. that way you can't look for another job. sooooo, you go to jail. HEY, now you are a burden to the taxpayers of the state of michiganistan. not only that you are now in the "SYSTEM".
if it were back in the middle ages you would be brought out to the city square and "STONED".
isn't michiganistan a wonderful "FREEDOM LOSING STATE" ?
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Sounds good, what other states do this
Might want to let the tourists know at the state border what our law is. Is it the same as connecting states. Maybe it SHOULD be.
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Michigan needs to start looking after it's children
They are a precious commodity. Plus, accidents resulting in injury increase health care costs, I imagine. This is responsible legislation.
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
4 Year olds aren't safe in just seat belts!
At 4 years old most children are not physically ready to be in a regular seat belt. Their legs, torso, and neck are not in proportion to the way the belt system is built, thus easily causing death in an accident. The main reason for this legislation is due to parents who don't care enough for their child's safety and don't keep them buckled in boosters and harnesses that are appropriate to their stature. If the parents can't be responsible, thank goodness you have a government that is looking out for the safety of your children.
|
|
-
-
-
Admin003


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Rep. Hoogendyk's "no vote explanation"
Rep. Hoogendyk, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:
"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:
I fully agree with the concept that booster seats for small children can possibly help save small children from injury or death in an automobile accident. However, there needs to be a limitation on how far the government reaches into the personal responsibility of individuals in our state. If in fact, booster seats help protect children, then what parent would not use them? Why should government mandate that we take common sense measures? This is not the role of government."
|
|
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
Your rights? No- it's the kids' rights.
It's not an infringement on your rights, it's an enforcement of your children's rights to be safe if you are too worried about forcing your children to grow up before they are physically ready so they "don't feel like a baby." Being killed due to internal injuries because of lack of safe child restraints- how "grown up!" The fact that the number one cause of death for children LEAPS to vehicle accidents from ages 4-12 kind of wooshes right over some people's heads eh?
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Anonymous Citizen


- Joined on 11-22-2008
|
no one will keep his vote from a politician who 'loves the children' or 'acts for the children'.
voters will, if given the opportunity, allow someone else to raise their children, school their children, discipline their children.
or even worse, they will allow their children NOT to be properly raised, not to be properly schooled, and not to be properly disciplined.
they will be convinced that this is wanted, needed, and even necessary if the parents want to 'fit in', to be 'fashionable', or for lack of a better term.. 'hip'.
they will give up what is RIGHT for what is POPULAR. and the state, in it's constant search for money, power, and more votes, will be happy to fill in for these piss poor parents.
|
|
-
-
|
|
|