Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 12-15-2005 9:56 AM by Admin003. 2 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    2005 Senate Bill 893 (Impose four year lifetime welfare limit)

    Introduced in the Senate on November 10, 2005, to establish penalties for a welfare recipient who fails to abide by the “family independence plan contract” requirements specified by Senate Bill 892. For the first violation the person would lose welfare payments for a month; for two months on a second violation; and two years for a third. This would not apply to disabled people or those who meet certain other requirements

    The vote was 24 in favor, 11 opposed and 3 not voting

    (Senate Roll Call 634 at Senate Journal 107)

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 12-03-2005 9:42 AM In reply to

    Sen. Jacobs' "journal statement"

    Senator Jacobs asked and was granted unanimous consent to make a statement and moved that the statement be printed in the Journal. The motion prevailed. Senator Jacobs' statement is as follows: I think I made pretty clear my feelings about this bill and I really did want to vote for this bill. However, without the Jacobs amendment--which, by the way, I just received a few minutes ago a call from the administration. The Governor is in full agreement with the Jacobs amendment and feels that it did give the flexibility that we really needed to have in this package. Without that amendment, unfortunately, I'm going to be voting "no" on this bill. My hope is that, as this moves through the House, we can do what is the best public policy for the people in Michigan, and that we can move forward and make some changes.
  • 12-15-2005 9:56 AM In reply to

    Rep. Lemmons' III "no vote explanation"

    Rep. Lemmons III, having reserved the right to explain his nay vote, made the following statement: "Mr. Speaker and members of the House: I voted 'no' for SB 893 (S-2) because providing information to recipient's whose benefits may be terminated about other resources which may exist will do very little in these hard economic times to help a family with no income or resources put food on their table or pay their rent."
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems