Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 10-18-2004 9:12 AM by Anonymous Citizen. 3 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    2003 Senate Bill 145 (Create procedure for opening roads closed by local government)

    Introduced in the Senate on February 4, 2003, to allow the county road commission in Oakland or Wayne County to transfer jurisdiction of a road from a local unit of government to the road commission if the road had been blocked for more than six months without a sufficient reason and/or the blockage provides a significant health, safety, or welfare concern. The bill refers in particular to Tienken Road, which the city of Auburn Hills has blocked at the border of Rochester Hills in Oakland County

    The vote was 37 in favor, 0 opposed and 1 not voting

    (Senate Roll Call 242 at Senate Journal 40)

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 02-08-2003 8:22 AM In reply to

    Excellent!!

    I teach about 100 kids during a school day. About 4 of them are wonderful and I am happy to see them arrive. The other Juniors and Seniors are lazy, mock patrotism, aggresively avoid responsibility and duty, are rude and disrespectful. They never address me as Mr. only by names like "Baldy" or "Senile" sometimes they call me Mr. Viagra! Maybe if a legislator is listening we could do this for students with poor attitudes and willingly poor academic performance. I mean the kids include the kids who play the system in special needs. Such kids with reading difficulties that you discover coming from the school store reading the ingredients on a pop can fluently while chewing gum and walking at the same time cursing public figures and educators.

    wje@japanimation.com
  • 10-01-2004 12:45 PM In reply to

    Rep. Bieda's "no vote explanation"

    Rep. Bieda, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: "Mr. Speaker and members of the House: I voted 'no' on Senate Bill 145 because it totally undermines local control."
  • 10-18-2004 9:12 AM In reply to

    Governor Yields to NIMBYs in Tienken Road Veto

    Governor Granholm has vetoed a bill that would reopen Tienken Road at the boundary of Auburn Hills and Rochester Hills by enabling the road to be transferred back to the Road Commission for Oakland County, which might resolve the dispute between the two cities. The Governor and some legislators have said it is important to preserve city control over local streets. Sorry, but mile roads like Tienken Road should be kept open and uncongested to allow free circulation by drivers over the roads they've paid for. Regional mobility is too important to be left up to local governments. Cities will ALWAYS act in favor of their local interests, and will try to divert traffic to neighboring jurisdictions and will sometimes actively screw motorists with mis-timed traffic signals and speed traps. Road-using taxpayers should be able to count on the state to defend our right to travel. SB 145 was a rare case of legislators standing up for the rights of the majority over NIMBYs ("not in my back yard"), but the Governor's veto shows that her loyalty is to local politicians, not the people. Who will stand up for the state when it's time to build Michigan's next highways, airports, power plants, factories and pipelines? Now that much of southeast Michigan is covered by home-rule cities whose boundaries butt up against each other, our leaders may occasionally have to stand up against local governments if the state's economy isn't to be paralyzed.
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems