<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economy</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/9.aspx</link><description>Regulation, Labor, Professions, Energy, Communications, Business Subsidies</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 (Debug Build: 30417.1769)</generator><item><title>Re: 2009 Senate Bill 594 (Allow ethanol plants on land zoned “agricultural” )</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/275107.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:59:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:275107</guid><dc:creator>JPHodge</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/275107.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=9&amp;PostID=275107</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Agreed.&amp;nbsp; Bad ideas like corn ethanol must compete on a level field in order to expose them for what they are.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: 2009 Senate Bill 594 (Allow ethanol plants on land zoned “agricultural” )</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/275074.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:57:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:275074</guid><dc:creator>gypsy</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/275074.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=9&amp;PostID=275074</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with the premise that ethanol should compete on a level playing field with fossil fuel, but it seems that allowing ethanol plants on agricultural land, near of course to it&amp;#39;s raw material source, just makes good sense. The bill limits it&amp;#39;s proximity to land zoned residential.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: 2009 Senate Bill 594 (Allow ethanol plants on land zoned “agricultural” )</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/275072.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:47:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:275072</guid><dc:creator>changeagent</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/275072.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=9&amp;PostID=275072</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The only way ethanol can be close to competitive is to exempt it from all the rules the rest of us have to put up with.&amp;nbsp; Nice pet project for the government.&amp;nbsp; It&amp;#39;s much easier to win the game when you make up the rules.&amp;nbsp; Make ethanol compete on a level field.&amp;nbsp; This should not pass.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>2009 Senate Bill 594 (Allow ethanol plants on land zoned “agricultural” )</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/275071.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2001 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:275071</guid><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/275071.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=9&amp;PostID=275071</wfw:commentRss><description>Introduced in the Senate on May 20, 2009&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href='http://www.michiganvotes.org/2009-SB-594'&gt;Click here to view bill details.&lt;/a&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>