Civil Law

Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

polarbear — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:10:03 GMT

Under sec, (3) A to E reason the court shall not grant a motion under subsection (1).

WOW A to E alot of jump rope'n to do to get to equal rights. Court Judge,Lawyers and family services need to go back and read ,follow laws of Paternity Act-1956 Pa 205 Mcl 722.711 to 722-730. READ it again,ITS THE LAW. Slavery is unlawful.

722.714 and 722.716 a LAW of BLOOD TEST RIGHTS THAT MUST BE FOLLOWED BY COURTS< JUDGES<FIA AGENCYS.

In that order of the paternity act. states that "unless it is proven that the child is NOT the issue/subject of th marriage.

The 722.717 is the problem-this gives courts to default judgement,trick or treat clause,without dna test rights.

This 722.717 needs to have a ADD-on, like= A default Judgement shall NOT be sent to alleged father unless a DNA TEST IS DONE.

If a default order to pay child support is ordered, father pays child support,a DNA test must be done,once a alleged father is found.

Father/ husband who is NOT the BIOlogical father=child support payments will be voided, and a new alleged father should be named.

SLAVERY= one owned and forced into service.

If a non-biological man/husband works/pays for another mans child, he then becomes a slave.

Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

silence dogood — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:21:52 GMT

another case of government by fraud and falsity.

Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

dougmrich — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:06:39 GMT

This has absolutely nothing to do with ideology, this is common sense. Being a paternity fraud victim myself, I believe I have herd about every opinion and solution in the book.

I was forced to pay the biological father child support for his own child, theres simply no justification for this. I was denied any form of visitation while ordered to pay support; there was no best interest of the child involved.

People say, you should not have had to pay. That would be a correct analogy, however the judge by personal opinion thought I should. The way the laws are drafted, I was denied any form of legal grounds to defend my rights or the best interest of the child.

This is all about Federal Funding Period; people must realize we are not talking about increasing tax on cigarettes for the general fund; we are talking about the best interest of family heritage for generations to follow.

Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

silence dogood — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:44:30 GMT

it's our ideology, all of us right of center. but it's also my opinion. i think that my ideology is much better applied to this situation than yours would be.

Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

jmangan — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:55:24 GMT

Always has to come back to your ideology, doesn't it?

Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

silence dogood — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:42:21 GMT

but yet our state seems to condone fraud and falsity as a means of government.

Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

dougmrich — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:38:49 GMT

A serious thought to consider, all contracts either written or verbal are invalid and void when enacted by the means of fraudulent terms including (perjury), and this would include marriage and a court order.

http://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?mcl-32-1131

Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

uber-liberal — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:57:10 GMT

money earned by fraud is the profit of a crime. fraud is illegal per se. prosecute it to the fullest extent of the law.

Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

dougmrich — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:50:49 GMT

Lets observe this from another end of the spectrum, A father, biological or not can be charged with felony non payment and child abandonment and sentenced to jail or prison for up to four years, and this happens on a daily basis.

The mothers in PATERNITY FRAUD Cases, such as mine should immediately charged with perjury and unjust enrichment by the means of extrotion. They should also be ordered to repay all monies plus interest received by the Fraud and enforced by the courts until the balance is paid in full. Let this mother sell their cars and homes; give up any retirement they may have accumulated and see what accountability really means.

That is Justice.

Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

polarbear — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:20:32 GMT

This house bill has been going on and on, slavery its unlawful to force a man/or husband to child support for a child NOT his.

If ya notice this bill has tricky wording,like -"Relief from child support with dna, will be denied,if a man knew child was Not his 6months before or after DNA test." How about a add rule "Women/ who knew a Man/husband is NOT a father of child before or after 6month shall be denied child support payments unless a DNA test is given,or the REAL father is found""""""

SLAVERY IS UNLAWFUL-slavery is when a person works for another persons duty. DNA test , freedom, if a women can get a man to pay after 6 years of waiting hunting, then a innocent husband should be relief of "slavery" after 6 years. Equal justice rights.

Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

crazycajun — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:11:33 GMT

this bill should MANDATE termination of child support, with a full refund if the d.n.a. test shows that there is no paternity.

to do any less is THEFT.

Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

crazycajun — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:58:57 GMT

a d.n.a. test should be the first order of business in a paternity dispute. it helps clear up who is lying to whom. if the NAMED father is not the ACTUAL father, that person should be sent on his merry way, and the woman who LIED TO THE COURT should be fined and imprisoned.

to do anything else is unethical, dishonest, and SHOULD BE ILLEGAL.

Re: 2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

dougmrich — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:47:15 GMT

House bill #4061 must pass, its time to end the incarceration of innocent men by the means of indentured servitude.

For more details of how important, the passage of this bill really is please visit

www.lawliars.com

2009 House Bill 4061 (Allow child support termination if DNA shows non-paternity )

admin — Mon, 01 Jan 2001 05:00:00 GMT

Introduced in the House on January 22, 2009

Click here to view bill details.