Civil Law

Re: BEST INTEREST OF CHILD

polarbear — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:17:09 GMT

Adoption code laws 710.56 are being used to place new laws into it. To AMEND a ADD on would be right way to go. After all congress use adoption codes to sneek in hidden revises to please, a Add on should be put into Adption code laws , first degree grandparents adoption visitation without discrimination of maternal/paternal. yea wheres the aarp when ya need them.

ParentRights should always be in place, So your right,if Parents/or courts place a GRANDCHILD up for adoption,parents rights are given up. So legislature, needs to MODIFY adoption code, to input new law" 710.56 (6)First degree Grandparents who adopt grandchild,be it Maternal,or paternal, this shallNOT prohibit either 1stdegree grandparents to visitation . Must be 1st.degree grandparent only. cause if a child is adopted direct new family thats it,no visits, but your right,if a child is adopted by GRandparents thats totally different,and child should have a right to keep that grandparent bond with other GRparents side

There are stepparent adoption codes,there are singleparent adoption laws,there is even a samesex partner adoption codes going on. Seem clear that GRANDPARENTS should have equal rights inputed into a NEW adoption code law to input visitation if a grandchild is adopted by another 1st.degree grandparent. Yes most states have that "except if a grandchild is adopted by grparent doesNot prohibit visitation petition, causeBEST interest of child would be placed above.

YES on 710.56- addOn (6) Except if a grandchild is adopted by maternal or paternal 1st.degree grandparent this doesNot prohibit the right of either grandparent or grandchild to petition for continued visitation bond. Sounds fair honest ,best interest of child, now if we can plead ,beg, write common sense into the head of legislatures minds,without inputing parents rights,cause when a child is going to be adopted by grandparent, the birthparents rights are already out of picture,thereby this 710.56 addon should be intro into form.

YES ON 710.56- Add-on a (6) EXCEPT IF A GRANDCHILD IS ADOPTED BY MATERNAL / PATERNAL 1st. DEGRE GRANDPARENTS THIS DOES NOT PROHIBIT THE RIGHT OF EITHER FIRST DEGREE GRANDPARENTS OR GRANDCHILD TO PETITION FOR THE CONTINUED VISITATION BOND.

You Don't Understand

Anonymous Citizen — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:38:16 GMT

the all knowing all powerful nanny state knows what's best for all of us. Just submit to their will and we'll all be better off.

Grandparents Rights Bah Humbug

Anonymous Citizen — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:32:06 GMT

Parents shouldn't be bashed here if they are acting in the best interest of their children. Both sets of grandparents are important, I do agree. BUT... if one grandparent is mentally unstable and it is unsafe for the child to be in her care, why is it OK to allow her to petition for her rights. She has allowed one death in her home, why should my seven year old be put in this danger. These laws need to be taken off the books and only nmediation allowed. I am the ONLY person who can decide where my children are allowed to go.

BEST INTEREST OF CHILD

Anonymous Citizen — Sun, 03 Feb 2008 15:07:55 GMT

Of course legislators been there done that thoughts will not even read these blogs to understand the true meaning of there mistakes under the grandparent laws. But then come election time the senators will NOT get anymore votes from the "EXCEPT GRANDPARENTS" who have been left out of the New so called mess up visit laws. That does Not care about children. Adoption of a grandchild prohibits visitation. SEEMS ODD THEY DIDNOT INPUT THE WORDS EXCEPT IF A GRANDCHILD IS ADOPTED BY A GRANDPARENTS THIS DOES NOT PROHIBIT A GRANDPARENT FROM VISITS,like most normal states do. REVISE ADOPTION CODES INPUT "EXCEPT GRANDPARENTS" ALL GRANDPARENTS ARE UNITED TO GET THIS NEW LAW SET, OR WILL BE NEW SENATORS VOTED IN THAT CAN.

NON equalJustice

Anonymous Citizen — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:57:44 GMT

Senate Sanborn was so worried about his Lawyer buds center,set a panic button off in legislation votes. Wonder why Sanborn dislikes Senior's,now he's try'in to input a Bill to output "Disability" Cards , all persons having a card have to get it revised and must prove all claims. Take away rights of children ,grandparents,disabled,now handicap. Mr.Sanborn stop trying to help lawyers,help the helpless,if your not going to act in best interest as a senator,why do you expect anyone to vote for you next term,when you lead pack for nonEqualJustice

why are Mich.adoption laws discriminated

Anonymous Citizen — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 15:49:47 GMT

grandp. are a needed used,until they are not needed anylonger then forced out of grandchilds life. How twofaced can legislation be? committee members,should have guideLines to visitation that must have best interest of child factors first,if child is the focus of Newlaws,legislature parents right refusal overrides all other childs best interest factors. only 1way recode adoptn codes. aarp,childrightorg,let legislature go hogwild. well,only category to allow "grandp.rights'back to the drawinboard,is to create NewLaw under Adoption if a grandchild is adopted by relative or grandpar shall not takeAway rights to visits that the child had previous with relative or other grandpar sides under best interest of child. Relative who adopt a child is Not same as directAdoptions,should have a clearly simple category addon,grandparent adoption areNot new family Unit the granchild needs visits from both, legislature should vote on revisebill advance adoptioncodes,all they need is addon votes entered under rules of directadoption,addon code6 cause grandpar adoption of grandchild should have include right of grandchild other grandpar visits. It does seem Mich.needs to advance in adopt areas, it would be discrimination to all grandparents. Mich.adoption laws need to be relegislated.addon's grandp.who adopt grandchildren,previous visits by either side,mat.or Pat. should have continuedvisit Michigan needs to step up to normalplate REVOTE

mich. needs to revise adoption code,differ input relative/gradparent

Anonymous Citizen — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:32:28 GMT

NO one is trying to output ParentRights org. and there is NO mixed signals. Gradparents are trying to get Legislature to understand that most normal states have already included,gradparents rights to even under ADOPTION laws,cause you see,gradparents who ADOPT gradChild,cut off VISITs legally,and the state of Michigan is BEhide times unconstutitional WE as Voters gradparents,childrenRights trying to in AMENDED addON only REVISE adoption code that states-adoption of child,prohibits gradparent to visitation. gradparent are Not directAdoption. SHOULD READ-Adoption of child,prohibit gradparents visits,EXCEPT if child is ADOPTED by GradParents. Michigan has only provisions for DirectAdoptions and thats discrimination,and harmful to childNeeds

Mich.aarp go/try again,grandchild needs both grandparents

Anonymous Citizen — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:40:19 GMT

AARP attorneys,all states have said,they hope't the supreme courts would stay away from influnce of 2000 cases troxl,but NO.now all granparents must fight even harder,eroded events effects,cause Michigan s acting Unconstitutionally discrimation. if child is adopted NOvisits,no matter whoAdopts. YES Mich.Adoption Codes Need NEW CODES written in grandparentAdoption are differ then DirectAdoption While many states,like southDakota laws ar honest. Adoption of child prohibits visits of grandchild, EXCEPT if CHILD is ADOPTED by grandParents. This gives NONdiscrimnation issues in CHILDSrights to fairly give needed VISITs to grandchild by the provenFit GRANDparents on both sides.Also gives th Childsupport needed moneyWise/and loving bond. Senior citizens think Mich.aarp didNOT even try. AARP go back to table,TRY AGAIN,ITS CHILDS RIGHT. adoption code laws,need RECODEING,REVISED,ADD ON. YES i vote to AMEND addOn,adoptionCode laws to the EXCEPT IF CHILD IS ADOPTED BY GRANDPARENTS,this doesNOT prohibit visitation by other grandparents.

BEST INTEREST OF CHILD,legislature OPEN UP YOUR REALITY CHECKS

Anonymous Citizen — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:58:03 GMT

Visitation is decided by parents,hopfully a child is not used as a revenge pawn,most grandparents who had a bond with grandchild,therein have proofn fitness of that lovin bond and to brake that bond is harmful to child,and adoption is another issue. Yes legislator should create a New law for all the Adoptions to include Adoption of grandchild by grandparents in 1stdeg.only,the grandparents shall have visits. yea,grandparents are grandparents. Well,Mich.Adoption codes are unconstitutional to all and unfair to child. Most states have/are inputing newbills/laws to cover differentadoptions Openadoption,with visits,protects parent+child. Directadoption,parents chose,mayMisrepresentfraud Stepadoption,should be different handled Law. RelativeAdoption,needs a different input Laws. Must protectright of child to have continuedVisit. Relative/or grandparentAdoption should NOT be the same code LAWS as in DIRECT/or step.adoption LAWS. Legislature please open up your reality checks. payments to the what whole idea of grandparents childbondvisit if supremecourtcongress is aloted to output all good exceptions/then just you must also give equal just inputPOSITIVEaddon CAN DO's. GrandparentADOPTION,must have NEWbill to included the RIGHTS of BOTHsides,in the adoption code laws. it will create POSITIVE best interest of CHILD. GRANDPARENTS ADOPTION OF GRANDCHILD,BEST INTEREST OF CHILD,SHALL ALLOW OTHER GRANDPARENTS VISITATION

MichiganLegislatureSmellTheCoffee

Anonymous Citizen — Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:43:18 GMT

In agreement with 4 and 6 point no risk of harm different adoption need different"provide Laws" Michigan has No provision for relative adoptions or grandparent adoptions, just court or direct. If parent rights groups need to take care of helping parents to become better parents in Appeal courts to reform signed forms laws.Parents need to put votes where its needed,help there own rights. Not to destroy grandparents trying to help a child Theres enough kids in foster homes. Voters get in VOTE FOR A NEW LAW TO HELP CHILDREN IN NEED. Adoption by grandparents in first deg.are not new family in the childs eyes and should be a NEW LAW voted in by common sense senators,in section, under Adoption Codes of 710.56 to help other first degree grandparents to no risk of harm continued bond with grandchildren. I agree with Polar Bear Mich.Legislature get up off your A,do whats Right. All of us Grandparents need to write to congress to help save our children life,please vote Now. VOTE TO ADD- 710.56 ADOPTION OF GRANDCHILD BY THE MATERNAL OR PATERNAL first degree GRANDPARENTS, SHALL NOT PROHIBIT VISITS BY EITHER SIDE of 1stDeg

a grandparent

rad52112 — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:32:07 GMT

I feel a grandparent should be allowed to see agrand child I haven't seen one of my grandchild for almost 2 yrs. my son has been in prison almost two years now went to freind of the court in muskegon they tell me to get a lawyer I feel the friend of court should handle that they need to revise the grandparent rights

Children need both Grandparents

Anonymous Citizen — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:32:28 GMT

One Morning Legislature wakes up after a night on town, decided Hey Lets Take away a Child's Rights and Force More Law Suits,Make Grandparents Prove it. I totally Vote for POLAR BEAR, a new add on Bill is there will be more legislators voted out this year. a good idea, To just add on to the ADOPTION Code law that polar bear food is right,use us then lose us. "ADOPTION OF GRANDCHILD BY GRANDPARENT RELATED IN FIRST DEGREE,MATERNAL OR PATERNAL GRANDPARENTS SHALL HAVE RIGHTS TO REGULAR VISITATION TIME.

Grandchild needs both sides,yes

Anonymous Citizen — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:49:52 GMT

parents right groups witch about grandparents time,but they should do get off there a's is help PARENT appeal in courts to get PARENTAL rights back and return a Childs. judges so bs fools they follow advice from unethical nonexpert therapist. judges who sign terminate parents rights so easy, put children in worst do more harm,then before. I agree with reform the forms,issue of protecting a child starts with forced"FORMs parents sign. cause if the system is so great, WHY are there so many Appeal Cases of BirthParents try'en to REvoke to get parent Rights returned. Parents Rights Org. should start helping Parents to be Informed on the "Reform the Form" Amendment to get Judges follow Laws, ask/offer counselor,and judges must also ask,Have you been given any Separate Agreement to sign Consent,that affects the finality of your consent. Parents doNOT know thes laws, Judges doNot follow the Laws, then a child suffers, child doesNot get to see parents or grandparents. Because FORMS doNOT include written statements that are the LAW. Yes,Reform the forms. Grandparents who adopt there Grandchildren both sides of first degree grandparents should have legal law rights to visitation agreements.Yes.

michigan congress wake up to a cup of common sense

Anonymous Citizen — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:58:13 GMT

Yea have to say,to grand parents are direct adoption it should be a law,710.56 adoption to add a sec.6 ,that both sets of grand parents first degree shall have a rights to continued grand parenting time. Michigan Congress should wake up to the needs of the children, adoption by grand parents,agreed to to add on to placement adoption laws. First degree grand parent adoption,grand child shall have right to grand parenting time with both sides. 710.56 add sec. 6, both sets of grands parent who have adopted grand child, either side can visit.

Vote Yes on First Degree Grand parents Visits

Anonymous Citizen — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:58:47 GMT

After reading hb727 it does seem clear it was revised and written for parents rights that was already in sections of who decides visit rights. And I Vote Yes also on Factors of Grandparents who adopt Grandchildren, the first degree other Grand parents should still have regular visit rights.