<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General Government </title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/16.aspx</link><description>Government Employees, Election Law, Constitution, Transparency, Branches</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 (Debug Build: 30417.1769)</generator><item><title>Rep. Law's "no vote explanation"</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/215249.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 14:42:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:215249</guid><dc:creator>Admin003</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/215249.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=215249</wfw:commentRss><description>Rep. Law, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement: 

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House: 

I voted no on HB 5338 and HB 5905, not because they are bad bills but to call attention to the Medical Community's continued insecurities about potential unintended consequences of the bills. These bills are intended to accomplish technical corrections in judicial interpretation which have been injurious to both plaintiffs and defendant physicians and patients alike. I hope that we will see cooperation between all the various interests in the future as these and other adjustments to the law are implemented to protect the interests of both patients and the medical community."</description></item><item><title>2003 House Bill 5338 (Revise medical malpractice lawsuit procedures)</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/209896.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2001 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:209896</guid><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/209896.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=209896</wfw:commentRss><description>Introduced in the House on December 3, 2003, to allow a plaintiff in a medical malpractice lawsuit to amend the affidavit of merit to correct a "formal defect," and establish timetables and procedures for challenging the amendment. The affidavit of merit is required in malpractice suits, and certifies that a qualified health professional has reviewed the records of the case and believes it has merit. See also House Bill 5905&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The vote was 58 in favor, 37 opposed and 14 not voting&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(House Roll Call 670 at House Journal 64)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href='http://www.michiganvotes.org/2003-HB-5338'&gt;Click here to view bill details.&lt;/a&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>