Health Care, Health Insurance, Health Regulations

Re: 2009 House Bill 4765 (Ban certain substances in children’s products )

Admin003 — Thu, 14 May 2009 14:46:41 GMT

Rep. Kowall, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill:

“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

No Vote Explanation

HB 4763-4769 (Toxic Toys)

Michigan is losing 1,000 jobs a day. Rather than working to fix our economy, Democrats are actively making it worse by introducing politically-charged bills that do nothing to lower our unemployment rate but instead create even more regulations that will drive away jobs and businesses.

After carefully studying this issue, I have arrived at the conclusion that this legislation as currently written will do absolutely nothing to make sure toys are safe. Instead of going after violators, the legislation creates a confusing patchwork of bureaucratic regulations and reporting requirements that will generate a lot of paperwork, but will fail to keep toxic toys out of the toy box.

Two other states considering similar legislation pegged the cost at more than $500,000 per year. Considering the governor just proposed firing 100 state police troopers to save money in the budget, I do not believe we can afford this expense at this time.

The EPA already has the ability to ban toxic substances and make sure they are not used in children’s toys. The proper solution is to continue working with the president and Congress to fix the problem at the federal level, which will actually block toxic toys from being sold, instead of creating another layer of burdensome regulations making it even harder to do business or create jobs in Michigan.

The fact that this legislation allows exemptions for foods that a child may actually ingest and tobacco products that will expose them to second-hand smoke proves that this legislation is more about scoring political points than it is about protecting children.

Claiming to do something ‘for the children’ is one of the oldest tricks in the politicians’ playbook, but grandstanding does not solve real problems. Unfortunately, rather than work in a bipartisan manner, lawmakers chose to ram this flawed legislation through the House instead of working to fix Michigan’s economy.”

Re: 2009 House Bill 4765 (Ban certain substances in children’s products )

Admin003 — Thu, 14 May 2009 14:45:37 GMT

Rep. Schuitmaker, having reserved the right to explain her protest

“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

No Vote Explanation

HB 4763-4769 (Toxic Toys)

Re: 2009 House Bill 4765 (Ban certain substances in children’s products )

Admin003 — Thu, 14 May 2009 14:44:37 GMT

Rep. Hildenbrand, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:

“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

Re: 2009 House Bill 4765 (Ban certain substances in children’s products )

truckingal — Sat, 02 May 2009 15:10:00 GMT

Never forget the law of unintended consequences! The recent federal rules on lead, etc were so restrictive that they affected the sale -at second-hand stores, flea markets, etc of used children's books, toys and clothing. In the case of books, it was the heavy metals in inks-and just how many kids are affected by heavy metal poisoning from eating books? None on record! So in many cases these kinds of restrictive laws really dont help and hinder many who clothe their children from second-hand stores.

The real problem is NOT American manufcturers-it is Chinese imports-lots of lead in amny of their products. Since the stste legislature cannot control what China does, the ideal woud be to make US retailers responsible for what's in the NEW products they sell-I guarantee if they were held responsible, there would be far fewer hazardous materials on the store shelves.

Re: 2009 House Bill 4765 (Ban certain substances in children’s products )

lschan01 — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:00:33 GMT

I think that this is a great idea! Anyway that we can keep children safer is good for me

2009 House Bill 4765 (Ban certain substances in children’s products )

admin — Mon, 01 Jan 2001 05:00:00 GMT

Introduced in the House on April 2, 2009

Click here to view bill details.