<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Social and Civil Liberty Issues </title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/13.aspx</link><description>Abortion, Gambling, Race, Gender, Guns, Drugs, Religion, Other</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 (Debug Build: 30417.1769)</generator><item><title>Re: 2011 Senate Bill 13 (Define fetus as an “individual” in statute )</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/279619.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:26:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:279619</guid><dc:creator>gypsy</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/279619.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=279619</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;The Supreme Court decision Roe v Wade affirmed a woman&amp;#39;s 9th and 14th amendment rights in regards to her privacy. Maybe the author of this proposed bill didn&amp;#39;t listen to the new Congress when they recently read it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: 2011 Senate Bill 13 (Define fetus as an “individual” in statute )</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/279604.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 21:09:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:279604</guid><dc:creator>DJStuCrew</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/279604.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=279604</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;More anti-woman political shenanigans: a fetus is NOT an &amp;quot;individual&amp;quot; until it can survive on its own, with no special life support technology.&amp;nbsp; That is the DEFINITION of &amp;quot;individual.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; This is nothing more than imposing one group&amp;#39;s ideology on everyone.&amp;nbsp; No right thinking person should stand for it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>2011 Senate Bill 13 (Define fetus as an “individual” in statute )</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/279603.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2001 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:279603</guid><dc:creator>Votes Admin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/279603.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=279603</wfw:commentRss><description>Introduced in the Senate on January 19, 2011&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href='http://www.michiganvotes.org/2011-SB-13'&gt;Click here to view bill details.&lt;/a&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>