<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Social and Civil Liberty Issues </title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/13.aspx</link><description>Abortion, Gambling, Race, Gender, Guns, Drugs, Religion, Other</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 (Debug Build: 30417.1769)</generator><item><title>Re: 2009 Senate Bill 499 (Mandate health care facilities grant “conscientious objector” status )</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/274932.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:20:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:274932</guid><dc:creator>gypsy</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/274932.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=274932</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;What &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; procedures would this include? Abortion I&amp;#39;m certain, but what others? Are we giving medical professionals the option of choosing which legal medical procedures they choose to perform, based on their personal religious or moral beliefs? If a procedure is legal, medically approved, and a professional is trained and capable of performing it, they should be required to provide it. The health and welfare of the patient should be the only consideration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think this is the slippery slope the President wanted to prevent us from going down when he repealed the Bush rule allowing medical professionals to opt out of &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; procedures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: 2009 Senate Bill 499 (Mandate health care facilities grant “conscientious objector” status )</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/274930.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:04:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:274930</guid><dc:creator>FreeSpeaker</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/274930.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=274930</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;The Mackinac Center synopsis of this bill says, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt; A person claiming this &amp;ldquo;conscientious objector&amp;rdquo;
status could not be subjected to civil, criminal, or administrative liability
for refusing to perform the objectionable procedure.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;I endorse that idea in principle.&lt;span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;However, in order for this to be fair it also should work
the other way &amp;ndash; that a practitioner cannot be subjected to civil, criminal or
administrative liability for performing an &amp;ldquo;objectionable&amp;rdquo; procedure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;Without coverage in both directions, which would allow fully for
the exercise of professional judgment and personal conscience, this bill should be
rejected.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: 2009 Senate Bill 499 (Mandate health care facilities grant “conscientious objector” status )</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/274834.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 01:57:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:274834</guid><dc:creator>Poppy</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/274834.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=274834</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;This sounds like a good &amp;quot;work around&amp;quot; for the latest fiasco pushed on us by Washington.&amp;nbsp; I like it. It sounds like a common sense way to stop further incursions in to what ever you believe in.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>2009 Senate Bill 499 (Mandate health care facilities grant “conscientious objector” status )</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/274833.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2001 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:274833</guid><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/274833.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=13&amp;PostID=274833</wfw:commentRss><description>Introduced in the Senate on April 30, 2009&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href='http://www.michiganvotes.org/2009-SB-499'&gt;Click here to view bill details.&lt;/a&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>