<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Environment and Property Rights </title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/12.aspx</link><description>Regulations, Land Use, Water Use, Natural Resources and Recreation</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 (Debug Build: 30417.1769)</generator><item><title>Re: 2009 House Bill 4199 (Ban launching boat if aquatic plant is attached )</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/271057.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:59:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:271057</guid><dc:creator>crazycajun</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/271057.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=271057</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;all great lakes shipping would immediately grind to a halt. they all have aquatic plants attached to them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;even the coast guard icebreakers have aquatic plants attached.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;imagine not having them be able to launch... no thought whatsoever was given to this bill...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;unenforceable, untenable, unmanageable, and impossible to monitor for compliance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: 2009 House Bill 4199 (Ban launching boat if aquatic plant is attached )</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/271054.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:53:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:271054</guid><dc:creator>Cj Williams</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/271054.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=271054</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I want to read section 41321.&amp;nbsp; Where is it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;b) &lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;(a) &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;&amp;quot;Council&amp;quot; means the invasive species advisory council&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;created in section 41321. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>2009 House Bill 4199 (Ban launching boat if aquatic plant is attached )</title><link>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/271052.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2001 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">85480579-cbb1-4596-8e66-ca77d6981342:271052</guid><dc:creator>admin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/thread/271052.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=12&amp;PostID=271052</wfw:commentRss><description>Introduced in the House on February 6, 2009&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href='http://www.michiganvotes.org/2009-HB-4199'&gt;Click here to view bill details.&lt;/a&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>