Re: 2009 House Bill 4282 (Require corporate conduct standards for state contracts )

Admin003 — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:26:00 GMT

Rep. McMillin, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:

“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted ‘No’ because I feel the following portion of this bill is too subjective and could be used to punish political opponents or to ensure political paybacks occur.

(D) BEEN CONVICTED OF ANY OTHER OFFENSE, OR VIOLATED ANY OTHER

14 STATE OR FEDERAL LAW, AS DETERMINED BY A COURT OF COMPETENT

15 JURISDICTION OR AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING, WHICH, IN THE OPINION

16 OF THE DEPARTMENT, INDICATES A LACK OF BUSINESS INTEGRITY OR

17 BUSINESS HONESTY THAT CURRENTLY, SERIOUSLY, AND DIRECTLY AFFECTS

18 RESPONSIBILITY AS A STATE VENDOR.”

2009 House Bill 4282 (Require corporate conduct standards for state contracts )

admin — Mon, 01 Jan 2001 05:00:00 GMT

Introduced in the House on February 17, 2009

The vote was 66 in favor, 42 opposed and 2 not voting

(House Roll Call 289 at House Journal 0)

Click here to view bill details.

Taxing & Spending

Re: 2009 House Bill 4282 (Require corporate conduct standards for state contracts )

2009 House Bill 4282 (Require corporate conduct standards for state contracts )