Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 05-23-2012 7:04 AM by jgurma. 6 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (7 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 04-10-2012 11:03 PM

    2012 Senate Bill 1053 (Allow double dipping by certain “retired” state employees )

    Introduced in the Senate on March 29, 2012

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 04-10-2012 11:07 PM In reply to

    Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1053 (Allow double dipping by certain “retired” state employees )

    The rich get richer... an open door for special favors... "department director or legislative majority leader claims the individual has “specialized expertise” that supposedly justifies the higher expense" ... If they want to go back to work, the pension should be suspended. Otherwise, get someone else.
  • 04-11-2012 12:16 AM In reply to

    Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1053 (Allow double dipping by certain “retired” state employees )

     LET ME SEE IF I READ THIS CORRECTLY . . .   employees of state government will be able to apply for and collect a taxpayer funded pension and continue to work at their same full-time government job and paid by the taxpayers as long as their department director or the majority leader CLAIMS (does not have to prove, but merely "claims") that the person has some kind of training or knowledge that SUPPOSEDLY (pretend, allegedly, believed, or imagined  -Merriam-Webster) justifies this unethical payment scheme, but again, no proof of justification is required.  Simply file a "claim" and there's no approval required, no oversight, nothing but cronyism, nepotism, and good-ole-boy backslapping.

    ARE YOU KIDDING ME???!!!   Are they at least required to clean out their desks and take a week off before they are "re-employed"?  Are they entitled to a retirement dinner/office party when they claim that they are supposedly retired?  They get to receive their full pension while they continue to work.  What a sweetheart deal that is.  But if a teacher reaches the 20 years of dedicated service level, and just by chance the local school district's contract has not been settled, they can not receive the level of pay previously agreed to for teachers with 20 years of service.  This is simply disgusting.

    But the REAL problem is . . . this will get passed in a heartbeat by the current unethical, corrupt, self-serving gang of thieves ever assembled in this great state and they won't see any shame in doing this.    

  • 04-11-2012 12:49 AM In reply to

    Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1053 (Allow double dipping by certain “retired” state employees )

    No, no and no. I totally disagree with SB 1053 and all double dipping should be stopped. Who judges the expertise of the person they wish to rehire when they've "retired?" This is just another example of government bureaucratic cronyism and all too often is one hand washing the other!

     

  • 04-11-2012 7:56 AM In reply to

    Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1053 (Allow double dipping by certain “retired” state employees )

    That would be triple dipping as State employee's are already dipping into(private sector) taxpayers pockets.
  • 04-11-2012 9:42 AM In reply to

    Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1053 (Allow double dipping by certain “retired” state employees )

    No!  In fact no pension for retired state employees, period.  I, a tax payer, receive no pension, so no pension for you either!  Open an IRA or 401K and discipline yourselves like the rest of us.  I thought Rebublicans were for reduced spending.  I guess not!

    Filed under:
  • 05-23-2012 7:04 AM In reply to

    Re: 2012 Senate Bill 1053 (Allow double dipping by certain “retired” state employees )

    online whiteboard Thanks for the tips, maybe I can use this ended my tufted marketing and I've been use untold anulus media in run a interaction and they someone existing a big amend on me.
Page 1 of 1 (7 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems