Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 11-15-2012 5:31 AM by reshhia. 4 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (5 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    2011 Senate Bill 178 (Appropriations: 2011-2012 Higher Education )

    Introduced in the Senate on February 22, 2011, the Senate version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2011-2012 higher education budget. This would appropriate $1.362 billion in gross spending, compared to $1.578 billion the previous year. $200 million of this would come from the School Aid Fund. The Senate did not adopt Gov. Rick Snyder's recommendation to cut more from universities that increase tuition by more than 7.1 percent

    The vote was 20 in favor, 18 opposed and 0 not voting

    (Senate Roll Call 111 at Senate Journal 0)

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 04-28-2011 11:56 AM In reply to

    Re: 2011 Senate Bill 178 (Appropriations: 2011-2012 Higher Education )

    Senator Hood, under his constitutional right of protest (Art. 4, Sec. 18), protested against the passage of Senate Bill 

    No. 178 and moved that the statement he made during the discussion of the bill be printed as his reasons for voting “no.”

    The motion prevailed.

    Senator Hood’s statement is as follows:

    As I spoke on General Orders, I oppose this budget because of the $200 million that is being taken from school aid 

    and being put into this budget. I think that the school aid money needs to stay in the school aid budget. I think just 

    because there are extra monies there, we shouldn’t be taking the money. We should be investing in students there. 

    Also regarding cuts to universities by about 15 percent, as was noted, my concern is that cut of 15 percent is passed 

    through tuition to the students, as testified in the Higher Education Subcommittee. The question was asked to some of 

    the universities was if this decrease in the funding potentially could be passed on to the students via tuition, and they 

    indicated it is a good possibility that could happen. My concern is could that happen and prevent some of our students 

    from reaching a higher education and reaching those points where they can be the educated workforce, so when these 

    jobs come to the state of Michigan, we will have the educated workforce to be there.

    That is my objection, and I will be voting “no” on this budget.

  • 08-08-2012 4:19 AM In reply to

    Re: 2011 Senate Bill 178 (Appropriations: 2011-2012 Higher Education )

    The Senate shouldn't change so often the rules for the fiscal year of higher education budget. I want to follow a master online next month to increase my chances to some prestigious positions at my work place. So I don't want to suffer because of these political changes. It wouldn't be fair for no one!
  • 10-01-2012 1:50 PM In reply to

    Re: 2011 Senate Bill 178 (Appropriations: 2011-2012 Higher Education )

    .
  • 11-15-2012 5:31 AM In reply to

    Re: 2011 Senate Bill 178 (Appropriations: 2011-2012 Higher Education )

    The actual Chair for economic council shouldn't adjust often the guidelines to the budgetary 12 months of upper schooling price range. I would like to have a get better at on-line the following month to improve our probability to your important positions within office. I really shouldn't go through of those political changes. It would not end up being truthful without a person http://www.rushmyessay**.*com/
Page 1 of 1 (5 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems