Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 11-05-2010 8:13 PM by lbweb. 2 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    2010 Senate Bill 1442 (Allocate borrowed water pollution money for non-point source responses )

    Introduced in the Senate on July 28, 2010

    The vote was 36 in favor, 2 opposed and 0 not voting

    (Senate Roll Call 506 at Senate Journal 0)

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 11-05-2010 9:19 AM In reply to

    • Judy
    • Top 50 Contributor
    • Joined on 11-22-2008

    Re: 2010 Senate Bill 1442 (Allocate borrowed water pollution money for non-point source responses )

     

     

    Senator Patterson’s first statement is as follows:

    As has been said, I rise with a heavy heart and no disrespect to the fine chair of the committee through which this bill passed and who is the prime sponsor.  Just for a little history, 2001-2002, I was in the House while Ken Sikkema was in the Senate struggling to get a $50 million clean water measure through the Senate. I had a conversation with a former legislator, Kirk Profit, who said: “Why don’t you go ahead and introduce legislation to create a $1 or $2 fund?” So we worked on that. In fact, we did get it passed, and it was supposed to address what SEMCOG predicted was going to be an enormous infrastructure problem. That problem was described as being a $35 billion to $40 billion problem that was going to have to be addressed for southeast Michigan only.

    So it is with the specific and articulated intent that this was not to be grant money. This was supposed to be a revolving loan bond fund. Now I understand times have changed and municipalities have difficulties, but this is expressly violative of the expressed intent that I expressed going around this state to editorial boards to promote ratification of this bond obligation, which is required by our Constitution and which was put before the people of the state of Michigan along with three other ballot measures in 2002.

    This was the only valid measure that was approved by the people and I fear it is yet again another example of how we tell the people one thing and then turn around and use their money for an entirely different purpose than what they intended.

    Senator Patterson’s second statement is as follows:

    While I am sure nobody listens to these things, posterity will reflect that the author of the bill that was ultimately approved by the voters of Michigan has so stated the original intent. If by chance this ends up in court, maybe even if I am not around to be called as a witness, they will reflect positively on what I said today; trying to be a strict adherent to the written word, the Constitution, and the oath I swore to my office.

     

  • 11-05-2010 8:13 PM In reply to

    • lbweb
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 06-02-2010

    Re: 2010 Senate Bill 1442 (Allocate borrowed water pollution money for non-point source responses )

    Dear Senator Patterson,

        Thank you for the effort you have expended regarding the misuse of taxpayer funds and the trust of the voters being perpetrated by SB1442.  I try to stay on top of the bills going through the State Legislature but this one I missed. I note with gratitude your opposition to this bill.  I, for my part, am composing letters to all the legislators who voted in favor of SB1442.  I know I won't say it as well as you did but at least I will add my voice to yours and put all on notice that we are watching.

    Thank you again.  I listened.

Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems