Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 07-02-2009 1:17 PM by sky1. 3 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    • admin
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 11-22-2008

    2009 Senate Bill 663 (Require "comprehensive sexuality” classes in public schools )

    Introduced in the Senate on June 25, 2009

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 07-02-2009 12:56 PM In reply to

    Re: 2009 Senate Bill 663 (Require "comprehensive sexuality” classes in public schools )

    What is this thing you people have with the obsession with other peoples sex life? With all the problems we have in this state that you ARE supposed to be dealing with, you're worrying over our kids sex life? Why dont you concentrate on the mess you've created in this state and forget this obviously personal project you're trying to push down our throat!

  • 07-02-2009 1:01 PM In reply to

    Re: 2009 Senate Bill 663 (Require "comprehensive sexuality” classes in public schools )

    This belongs in a home, not the school. You people disgust me. Quit jamming this junk down our throats. Fix the state and leave it alone.

    I just saw my electric rate increase a month or so ago...now my Consumers bill reflects a surcharge and a note about Consumers looking at a rate increase...but somehow in the longrun it's going to "SAVE" me money. You folks can't do basic math and figure out how to revive an economy (lower taxes, get out of the way of business, etc) so I'm sure you can't teach sex in the school and you're the last group of people I'd want my daughter learning from. Sex ed belongs in the home and should be based on a particular family's values, not some standard you idiots decide on. There better be an "opt out" option for parents if it passes.

     

  • 07-02-2009 1:17 PM In reply to

    • sky1
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 07-02-2009

    Re: 2009 Senate Bill 663 (Require "comprehensive sexuality” classes in public schools )

     Dear Ms Clark,

    From all I read and understand the state does not have the money to support out schools.  If this is true, wouldn't it be more prudent to cut state mandated requirements for our public schools and save money?   Did you have sex education taught to you in school?  If not how have you been able to obtain the status you currently enjoy?  Please rethink and withdraw your bill from consideration.

    Thank you,

    Dave in Lapeer  

Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems