if there were logic, i wouldn't have to ask the question. how is that question provocative? the topic is whether or not animal sodomites should be placed on sexual offender lists. you haven't answered the basic question on your views of the basic premise of the thread.
and, according to the question, the crime is not animal cruelty, it is animal sodomy. stop changing the argument to fit your preconcieved notions. now, if you feel that all animal sodomy is animal cruelty, and that the laws surrounding both should be changed, i'd be happy to hear your opinions on that as well.