Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 04-21-2009 1:12 PM by Ldsautumn. 43 replies.
Page 2 of 2 (44 items) < Previous 1 2
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 03-24-2009 10:00 AM In reply to

    • gypsy
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 03-19-2009

    Re: 2009 House Bill 4499 (Revise prison time off for good behavior )

    If this bill passes, it will be a new law that shortens sentences.

  • 03-24-2009 10:05 AM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 4499 (Revise prison time off for good behavior )

     totally bypassing the judicial branch. working retroactively. giving shortened sentences to those that especially don't deserve them. incurring the ire of the voter.

  • 03-24-2009 6:05 PM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 4499 (Revise prison time off for good behavior )

     why would the legislature not wish disciplinary actions to be held against inmates who are applying for early release?

  • 04-21-2009 1:12 PM In reply to

    Re: 2009 House Bill 4499 (Revise prison time off for good behavior )

     Trying to establish shorter sentencing guidelines was tried and was unsuccessful.  Yes sentences are assigned by a Judge but Judges are also not allowed to sentence outside of guidelines when they want to.  At times their hands are tied as well.  Judges used to sentence someone to life and that used to mean 25 yrs but when Engler changed the make-up of the parole board to elected positions instead of under MDOC the parole board determined that "life should mean life" thereby re-sentencing these individuals.  Funny, I didn't think the parole board could over-ride the sentencing judge!!  That is why the Supreme court has weighed in on this and found in favor of the lifers!!! 

    Saying that they can simply charge less per inmate per day doesn't make much sense.  The cost has to do with the amount of money that the Department of Corrections spends on salaries, and other necessities.  They have cut as much as they possibly can.  In most cases those things that the general public thinks they pay for are paid for out of the Inmate Benefit Fund.  Funds that inmates contribute to.  They can't simply charge themselves less.  Doesn't work that way.

Page 2 of 2 (44 items) < Previous 1 2
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems