Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 01-30-2012 9:12 PM by gypsy. 18 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (19 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-04-2009 7:27 AM

    • TrueBlue
    • Top 25 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on 11-22-2008
    • Chicago/Detroit

    Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

    If you are a wage earner then the GOP are redistributing your hard earned money to the wealthy.

     This is because only the SS payroll tax payers are paying a SURPLUS of tax revenue. SS payroll taxes are collected ONLY on wages under $100,000.00. Republican  INCOME tax cuts take the payroll tax surplus collected from wage earners under $100,000.00 and REDISTRIBUTES 90% of it to incomes over $100,000.00 and to Capital Gains. Millionaires who paid not one penny into the payroll tax surplus!
    Please explain how an income tax cut does not redistribute the payroll tax surplus!

    Wealth Re-distribution Republican style.

     

    Filed under:
  • 01-04-2009 4:26 PM In reply to

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

     that's easy...

    a RE-DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH takes away from one person, the wage earner, and gives it to ANOTHER PERSON, the welfare recipient.

    a TAX CUT doesn't TAKE AWAY ANYTHING, it lets the WAGE EARNER KEEP HIS MONEY.

    THAT is the difference.

    pity you couldn't work that out for yourself.

     

    michigan constitution,  article 1. Sec. 6.

    Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

     keep your powder dry.

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Bovard 1994

  • 02-17-2009 11:13 PM In reply to

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

     You both are right on this one. 

    Whether you tax wealth, property, income, wages or breathing, the money goes away from the earner/owner and is redistributed to whatever "worthy" cause/person your elected representative feels like rewarding.

    So the democrats reward unions and the republicans reward business.  Big deal. 

    The main point is that it is taken from the person who earned/owned it by force and given away at the whim of whomever is pretending to be looking after our best interests.

    As long as they don't take too much, and we don't care, this parasitical behavior can continue.  What they had better be afraid of is, with the downturn in this economy, that they may already be taking too much.  They better hope that the peasants don't revolt and start lynching legislators.  We could be moving this way very soon if GM goes bankrupt and half the state is unemployed and the state is unable to fund unemployment insurance timely. 

    Remember 1968.  People will only take so much.  At a certain point, anyone can snap.

     

  • 02-17-2009 11:28 PM In reply to

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

    The money isn't just taken from one person and given to another. Tax dollars go into roads, bridges, schools, prisons, national defense, water systems, sewer systems on and on. O yea, some of it goes to subsidize farmers, poor people, businesses and science and the arts. That's what makes a good society work. Some of it isn't well spent, and we need to constantly keep our eye on that. But to portray taxes as money that is stolen from us is ludicrous. And to advocate lynching and rioting is not only stupid, but criminal.

    I hope the moderaters are reading this, Mike Hignite.

  • 02-18-2009 12:29 AM In reply to

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

    jmangan:

    The money isn't just taken from one person and given to another. Tax dollars go into roads, bridges, schools, prisons, national defense, water systems, sewer systems on and on. O yea, some of it goes to subsidize farmers, poor people, businesses and science and the arts. That's what makes a good society work. Some of it isn't well spent, and we need to constantly keep our eye on that. But to portray taxes as money that is stolen from us is ludicrous. And to advocate lynching and rioting is not only stupid, but criminal.

    I hope the moderaters are reading this, Mike Hignite.

     

    I respectfully disagree.  How is it that taxes are not stolen from us?  That is exactly what is happening.

    A man asks me for money to help the poor (maybe it's true, and maybe it's for him. I don't know).  I say it's my money and I refuse.  He and his gang of 534 friends tell me I better give them the money, or they threaten me with bodily harm.  I still refuse.  They use force to take what is mine.  If I continue to resist, he beats me or kills me.  Once they have my money, maybe they give it to the poor, buy crack, or hell, maybe give me cab fare home!

    How does it make a difference if I just replace "man" with "taxman"?  The exact same thing is going on.  You just aren't used to seeing what is really going on under the magic curtain of the word "government".

    I disagree that what makes a good society work is taking money by force from one group and giving it to another group or purpose.  I know that is what we've been doing, but that doesn't make it good.  All those things you mentioned are great, schools, infrastructure etc.  But that doesn't mean that forcing people to do it the way our government has done it in the past is good.  People are able to make their own decisions for their own best interest and for those around them without getting locked into government bureacracy and stagnation.  You may have noticed that government is particularly poor at picking winners in the economy.

    Finally, please read my post.  I never ADVOCATED lynching and rioting; you are correct, that would be illegal.  I'm only pointing out that throughout history, rulers have been deposed violently by the ruled, and it looks to me like we could see those circumstances here. 

     

     

     

  • 09-16-2009 12:41 AM In reply to

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

    Perhaps, where this is misleading could be the idea that not as much money is returned to us, the people of the state (State taxes), and the people of the U.S.A.(Federal taxes).

    Don't forget the Bureaucracy must be funded

  • 04-07-2010 1:39 PM In reply to

    • gypsy
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 03-19-2009

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

    Taxes provide the government the ability to provide the citizens with the environment in which they earn their money. To be categorically against taxes is to be against our way of life. To be vigilant as to our our representatives use our tax dollars is prudent.

  • 01-09-2012 5:12 PM In reply to

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

     Gypsy..........with that said about taxes above............how much should (in % form) should a taxpayer pay in taxes then?  40% of their paycheck?  50% of their paycheck?  60% of their paycheck?  80% of their paycheck?  100% of their paycheck?  Tell all of us what the % out of a persons paycheck for taxes is the right amount for the government to be happy?  After you get done with that answer, please tell all of us taxpayers when it will ...........stop.that is........Will the government want to rasie taxes again the following year after prices and services for big government rise?

     

  • 01-09-2012 10:29 PM In reply to

    • gypsy
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 03-19-2009

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

    Taxes should be paid at whatever rate is required for the amount of government services citizens desire. The fairest way to do this is with a progressive tax rate.
  • 01-19-2012 3:49 PM In reply to

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

    Mother Gypsy - So your saying the Citizens should bargain with the state employees Oh boy sign me up Im ready when does this start. great idea the union will love that idea Gypsy did you think that up all by yourself.
  • 01-19-2012 5:07 PM In reply to

    • gypsy
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 03-19-2009

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

    Representatives of the citizens should bargain with the state employees; yes. But what I said was germane to the discussion. That is: Taxes should be paid at whatever rate is required for the amount of government services citizens desire. The fairest way to do this is with a progressive tax rate.
  • 01-19-2012 5:10 PM In reply to

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

     With that said gypsy........then what is the limit on taxes that a citizen should pay then, in %'s that is?  George Soros and Saul Alinsky are so proud of you I know.  Try reading this one:  "The Road to Serfdom".........by F.A. Hayek  ...............your brain might come to life!  Then again...........at least try!

     

  • 01-19-2012 5:12 PM In reply to

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

     Watch this and become educated for a change instead of indoctrinated:

    A government gone wild with a 15 to 1 ratio. 

    http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=xOAgT8L_BqQ&feature=player_embedded

     

  • 01-19-2012 5:15 PM In reply to

    • gypsy
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 03-19-2009

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

    That is such an easy question. The limit on taxes a citizen should pay is for what services they want, and what money the nation needs to function. That is determined by elections, not opinions. Neither yours, nor mine.
  • 01-19-2012 5:16 PM In reply to

    • gypsy
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 03-19-2009

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

    Tater, you need to improve the quality of your internet surfing.
  • 01-23-2012 11:34 AM In reply to

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

     Is this you Gypsymoth or is this just one of your "typical" left wing moonbats that got lose from the animal farm.?

    http://moonbattery.com/?p=7164

     

     

  • 01-26-2012 8:43 AM In reply to

    • gypsy
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 03-19-2009

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

    Maybe reading a newspaper would help?
  • 01-30-2012 1:39 PM In reply to

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

     .

    The "Party of Food Stamps" (PFS) has now entered into yet another era by becoming the new party called"The Party of More Food Stamps" (PMFS) by announcing a brand new entitlement, grant program to "expand job growth".  We are not making this stuff up America.  This is what is running our country for job growth and expansion of jobs............while everyone is on "food stamps"!  How's that "Hope & Change" thing working out for everyone now?  Thank you Barack Obama! These have been the most "memorable years" in this countries history.
     

     

  • 01-30-2012 9:12 PM In reply to

    • gypsy
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 03-19-2009

    Re: Tax cuts=Wealth re-distribution

    More "weaselzipper" misinformation and distortion.
Page 1 of 1 (19 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems