Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 11-15-2008 7:38 PM by Anonymous Citizen. 4 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (5 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    2008 Senate Bill 1572 (Restrict vehicle tracking device use )

    Introduced in the Senate on November 5, 2008, to prohibit the installation or use of a motor vehicle tracking device without a person’s knowledge, with exceptions for legitimate services (like On-Star), or use by law enforcement

    The vote was 36 in favor, 0 opposed and 2 not voting

    (Senate Roll Call 655 at Senate Journal 87)

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 11-11-2008 11:48 AM In reply to

    got something to hide?

    Is someone worried about where there going in government or personal vehicle? This was brought up before. If you don’t own the vehicle and the owner wants to put a tracker on it they should be able to with out telling the driver. In fact there should be tracking devices on all government vehicles without telling the driver. Let’s see what you’re really doing on government time. The same should be allowed for companies, they pay for the operation of the vehicle, and they have the right to know. If you work for them you should have no reason to worry if there is a tracker in the vehicle. It can also help to find out if your spouse is cheating. What don’t you want us to know Sen. Ray Basham? I can account for every minute in my life,and I have nothing to worry about, can you? The motive in this bill, strongley leads to dishonesty. I see no good reason to allow this to pass
  • 11-13-2008 11:27 PM In reply to

    tracking device

    In a govt or private vehicle, does not matter. It sure smacks of big brother. KILL THIS BILL.
  • 11-15-2008 8:24 AM In reply to

    Hey BIG bro

    It only applies to you not the police. or investigators, big brother LOL
  • 11-15-2008 7:38 PM In reply to

    reply to LOL

    Read the words again and think about "or use by state law enforcement." That is a very broad and loose interpretation. Theoretically they would and could put a device on any and all vehicles, public or private. PS, Pull your head out of the sand and skip the sarcasm.
Page 1 of 1 (5 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems