Michigan Votes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Great Lake State.
Welcome to Michigan Votes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 06-09-2008 9:33 AM by Anonymous Citizen. 6 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (7 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    • admin
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 11-22-2008

    2008 House Bill 6118 (Revise government pension management details )

    Introduced in the House on May 14, 2008

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 06-07-2008 11:22 AM In reply to

    Revise pension ?

    The government pension should be managed by the taxpayers, they are the ones who are FORCED to pay for it!
  • 06-08-2008 8:50 AM In reply to

    Remember The Principle

    “The government pension should be managed by the taxpayers, they are the ones who are FORCED to pay for it!” Well and good, as far as it goes. The key thing to remember is that government workers’ pensions are an earned benefit – something those people work to earn as part of their overall compensation packages. That means the employer has a contractual (and conservatives would say, therefore, a moral-ethical) obligation to deliver the agreed upon benefit to employees. The employer should be expected and required to deliver those benefits. I figure that’s the way the vast majority of private sector employees would prefer to be treated. Let’s remember The Golden Rule. At least in the public employment sector we have an opportunity to insist that workers be provided the compensation and benefits they have labored for and earned.
  • 06-08-2008 3:32 PM In reply to

    right

    Yeah, I "labored" I "earned" I "PAID TAXES" I have nothing left. Good luck getting your "pensions" from a state that is broke, hell, its more that broke. Tis in the RED. Not my money!
  • 06-08-2008 4:02 PM In reply to

    Let's See

    Because you feel like you have had a raw deal in the private sector, it's OK to back out on commitments made (in your name) to employees in the public sector. In other words, you think giving someone else a good hard kick in the kajoobies is bound to make you feel a lot a better and solve all your own ills. Here's some news for you. Imposing hard breaks on some else who no more earned them than you did will not compensate you for your loss. Nor will it actually make you feel better, unless you are some kind of a sociopath.
  • 06-09-2008 9:25 AM In reply to

    No pension

    How about prorating legislative pensions and health care benefits for the years they actually worked? They are not full time State employees, who have to work 10 years to be vested in the old days and 4 years to be vested now. Give them the same benefits as State workers. Why do they get better benefits for less time worked and less productivity?????
  • 06-09-2008 9:33 AM In reply to

    It's Good To See

    Someone differentiate between public employee pensions and the pension and health benefits received by elected officials. Anger and frustration that really is precipitated by elected officials should not inspire attacks directed at ordinary civil service employees as a class.
Page 1 of 1 (7 items)
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems